🚀 go-pugleaf

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software  - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Bill" <billnech@msn.com> wrote in message
news:272503be.0401281014.121b808f@posting.google.com...
> "Brian" <Witch*Dr@usa.nojunkemail.net.ru> wrote in message
news:<AIMRb.8529$Iw6.7144@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
> > "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > news:101emj6gq7rld37@corp.supernews.com...
> > > There was plenty of time to count the votes by hand.  Could have
easily
> >  been
> > > done in a week once the legal bullshit was over and they just settled
down
> > > to business.  Actually, it wouldn't have delayed the inauguration an
> >  hour -
> > > not that the inauguration date is sacred -- certainly wasn't in the
> >  earlier
> > > days of our nation.
> >
> > And to think, if Gore asked for a full recount to start with, there'd
have
> > been time. Bummer for Gore...he chose poorly.
>
> I agree with this statement.  I voted for Gore and would again.  I
> also think George W is the worst president of my lifetime, which goes
> back to Ike, and I will support ANYBODY with a chance to defeat him.
>
> Bush and his brownshirts did shut down attempts to recount the votes
> in the counties that Gore requested.  However, I agree that Gore
> should have simply requested a recount of the state.  In fact, it is
> likely to be Republican areas in which Democrat votes may have been
> undercounted.

Ah, but Mark Cook said such a state-wide recount would have been illegal.