🚀 go-pugleaf

"Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:100tats5ikbs89e@corp.supernews.com...
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free software  - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Mark Cook" <mcook@prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:GDmPb.26944$qV1.1665@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> > "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > news:100ro39n2orgd8e@corp.supernews.com...
> > > --
> > >
> > > "Mark Cook" <mcook@prodigy.net> wrote in message
> > > news:FBhPb.26888$bZ.20304@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> > > > "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:100r4ce5p9cv023@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > >As I said, the Democrat were illegally throwing out legal
overseas
> > > > ballots.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lie.  None of the ballots were thrown out.
> > > >
> > > > Why would a judge order the inclusion of ballots that had NOT been
> > thrown
> > > > out???
> > >
> > > Democrats, huh?  Your source impeaches this claim - it says nothing
> about
> > > the Democratic Party.
> >
> > Who wrote the 5 page memo telling Democrats how to challenge ballots?
>
> Got any evidence it was ever implemented?

I gave the Washington Post link earlier in this thread.

> Got any evidence the Repugs didn't also have a similar strategy?

I am supposed to prove a negative?

> > You just pointed out that a court ordered ballots to be reinstated. IF
the
> > Democrats did not have ballots thrown out, why did the court order them
to
> > be reinstated?
> >
> It wasn't the Democratic Party.  You're attempting to paint the Dems as a
> villain.  They're not.

It was members of the Democratic Party. The links to the Washington Post
article and the fact that the Democrat controlled election board was a
defendant in a suit that the canvassing board lost, proves that it was
Democrats.

> Far more damage was done to democracy by the
> Repuglicans blocking the count than was ever done by anyone's attempt to
> enforce laws on the books.

Since there was NEVER a legal recount ordered by ANY court, your point is
invalid. As to enforcing laws on the books, don't make me laugh. There is no
law on the books that REQUIRES postmarks, that allows for dimpled chads to
be considered votes, that allows for partial county recounts, that requires
ballot request, ect. How you can say Democrat were trying to enforce laws on
the books is beyond me.

> The specific case you cite is simply a
> difference between Federal and State law that has nothing to do with
> Political parties.  In fact, the ruling points that out.

Bush vs. Hillsborough County Canvassing Board was a case against a DEMOCRAT
controlled election board. The DEMOCRAT board LOST the case and were
REQUIRED to include ballots that they had thrown out in violation of the
both Florida and Federal Election Code along with the Uniformed and Overseas
Citizens Voting Right Act.