🚀 go-pugleaf

"Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:100oumfaef9f5af@corp.supernews.com...
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free software  - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Mark Cook" <mcook@prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:Q9YOb.58644$dW6.42750@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > news:100o1v346ru654c@corp.supernews.com...
> > > --
> > >
> > > How does that negate my statement that "Bush was first to go to court
to
> > > block any and all counts"?
> >
> > Because you infer that Bush tried to block legal recounts. We know that
to
> > be false.
> >
> Wrong.  No matter how you spin it, you cannot impute high morals/ethics to
> the Bush Campaign.

You really need to read the court cases that came out of Florida. Between
the Democrats illegally throwing out overseas ballots, to the illegal
partial recount, to the illegal changing of the counting standards, you will
find that the Democrats do not hold the moral high ground.

> They were ahead and they intended to block any and all
> recounts.

The court record proves otherwise.

> It is crystal clear from Baker's statement that they wanted the
> machine counts to be final and for no manual recounts under any standard
to
> go forward.  Baker's claim that machines are more accurate than people is
an
> outright lie.

We had 11 Judges and Gore's Florida Campaign Chair, who found that the
manual recounts in Palm Beach County and Miami-Dade were inaccurate because
they illegally changed the counting standard.

You were saying?

> -------------
> George W. Bush's campaign went to federal court in Florida on Saturday,
> determined to block Democratic requests for hand recounts of votes of
> portions of the state that holds the key to the 2000 presidential
election.
>
> Former Secretary of State James A. Baker III said the Republicans had
acted
> "to preserve the integrity and the consistency and the equality and
> finality" of Tuesday's close vote between the Texas governor and Vice
> President Al Gore.
>
> Baker insisted that a manual recount would be more susceptible to error
than
> a machine tally.

Turned out that the manual recount was susceptible to Democrats illegally
changing the law on what defined a legal vote in Florida.

> "Machines are neither Republicans nor Democrats and therefore can be
neither
> consciously or unconsciously biased," he said.

And that was proven to be true.

> http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/111100-01.htm
>
> <snip rest of Shotgun Obfustication>