🚀 go-pugleaf

"lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com> wrote:

> 
> Lobby Dosser wrote:
>> Don Homuth <dhomuth1@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:09:59 GMT, Lobby Dosser
>> > <lobby.dosser.mapson@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>DID THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS CLAMOR FOR FOOD STAMPS?!
>> >
>> > Depends on how you want to see it.  Food Stamps were a relatively
>> > lower cost method of getting food to the hungry than was the
>> > previous welfare system.
>> >
>> > Lower is better than Higher.
>> >
>> > At the time, Murkens generally approved of doing it, and the
>> > grocery industry Really approved of doing it.
>> >
>> >>> Most constituents don't ask for bridges across specific rivers,
>> >>> yet they are provided withal, because Some constituents find them
>> >>> necessary.
>> >>
>> >>THEN THE CONSTUENCY IS ********NOT******** CLAMORING!!!!!!
>> >
>> > It's not supposed to be Clamoring.
>> >
>> > Folks leave that sort of thing up to your lot.
>> >
>> >>SEE HOW THAT WORKS?
>> >
>> > Have for years.  Back when I was in the Nordakoda State Senate, we
>> > passed a school aid bill for something like $152M -- which was, at
>> > the time, a considerable sum of money.
>> >
>> > Was "the majority" clamoring for it?
>> >
>> > Probably not.
>>
>> Then the LEGISLATURE SOLVED A PROBLEM THE PEOPLE DIDN'T CARE ABOUT.
> 
> 
> Not only that but it violates Don doctrine that such matters be
> handled locally.
> 
> Of course, I doubt that was his policy then and I'm quite sure he was
> rewarded by the teacher's union for his efforts.
> 
> 

Oh shoot. I missed that. I usually stop reading when I get woozy from the 
gas.