Re: libdbm: bad block

Article View: pe.cust.bugs

Article #16

#16

From: David Sherman
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1985 16:27

13 lines
981 bytes

Can't help you there, but do you really need to use dbm? I
just ran pathalis to produce a text file, ran sort on the file,
and use look(1) to extract sites quickly with binary-search.
(We have a "uupath" shell file which basically just runs
look $1 /u/map/uupath.)

By the way, look at the References line above. Has okstate really
posted 26.5 million articles? :-)

Dave Sherman
-- 
{utzoo pesnta nrcaero utcs hcr}!lsuc!dave
{allegra decvax ihnp4 linus}!utcsri!lsuc!dave

Technical Details

Message-ID: <488@lsuc.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lsuc!dave

References: <26500001@okstate>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lsuc!dave
From: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman)
Newsgroups: pe.cust.bugs
Subject: Re: libdbm:  bad block
Message-ID: <488@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: 7 Mar 85 16:27:45 GMT
Date-Received: 7 Mar 85 16:27:45 GMT
References: <26500001@okstate>
Reply-To: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman)
Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto
Lines: 13
Summary: why bother with dbm?

Reply to Parent Message