Re: forget about the -O option to cc

Article View: pe.cust.general

Article #8

From: Earl Wallace
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 1985 04:21

11 lines
1107 bytes

I think the reason that the -O option exists at all is because it was a simple
matter to replace the optimizer program (c2) with a link to copy rather than
hack up the source code.  Another thing you might want to watch out for is
the multiple defines caused by the SCCS headers in the /usr/include/* files. 
I always do "cc -DNO_SCCS_ID -m" just to get around most of the errors.  It
seems to help a lot.
-- 
Earl Wallace
UUCP:   ..!{ihnp4, ucbvax!hplabs, ucbvax!twg}!pesnta!earlw
PHONE:	(408) 727-5540 x230
USMAIL:	Perkin-Elmer Corp., Santa Clara, Calif. 95054

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2664@pesnta.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lsuc!pesnta!earlw

References: <392@lsuc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2(pesnta.1.3) 9/5/84; site pesnta.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lsuc!pesnta!earlw
From: earlw@pesnta.UUCP (Earl Wallace)
Newsgroups: pe.cust.general
Subject: Re: forget about the -O option to cc
Message-ID: <2664@pesnta.UUCP>
Date: 13 Feb 85 04:21:58 GMT
Date-Received: 13 Feb 85 04:24:56 GMT
References: <392@lsuc.UUCP>
Reply-To: earlw@pesnta.UUCP (Earl Wallace)
Distribution: pe.cust
Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG, Santa Clara, Calif.
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message