Article View: pe.cust.wanted
Article #5Re: BSD software
From: David Sherman
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1985 19:16
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1985 19:16
18 lines
1421 bytes
1421 bytes
Earl Wallace (pesnta!earlw) writes:
||If you have a 5.2 source license from AT&T (not from Sears!), you can pass
||licensed source around like it was water. P-E to P-E, P-E to Customer, P-E to
||DEC, DEC to Data General, Customer to Customer, etc. Thats how AT&T feels
||about it. There was some discussion on the net about BSD source and the
||general feeling is that you need a 5.2 AT&T license. period. The code in
||BSD was written from tax payer's pockets and thus falls into the public domain
||and the rest of the code is from AT&T.
But 4.1BSD certainly wasn't developed from System V at all, since
it predates System V. We have a System III license. If a Sys V.2
license would entitle me to use 4.2BSD source, should not a Sys III
source license entitle me to use BSD source which was derived from v7?
Dave Sherman
--
{utzoo pesnta nrcaero utcs hcr}!lsuc!dave
{allegra decvax ihnp4 linus}!utcsri!lsuc!dave
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<501@lsuc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lsuc!daveReferences:
<496@lsuc.UUCP> <2692@pesnta.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lsuc!dave From: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) Newsgroups: pe.cust.wanted Subject: Re: BSD software Message-ID: <501@lsuc.UUCP> Date: 11 Mar 85 19:16:24 GMT Date-Received: 11 Mar 85 19:16:24 GMT References: <496@lsuc.UUCP> <2692@pesnta.UUCP> Reply-To: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Lines: 18