Thread View: pgh.general
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by In Your Dreams
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:36
Top 10 Conservative Idiots: Two Faced Edition
Author: In Your Dreams
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:36
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:36
296 lines
19664 bytes
19664 bytes
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots
September 27, 2004
Two Faced Edition
It's long been understood that Our Great Leader consistently
says one thing and does another. This week, he's gone way beyond that.
Yes, George W. Bush (1) may have given up cocaine, but it appears that
he's now on LSD. Fortunately he's got the ever-credible Ayad Allawi
(2) to back him up, and when I say back him up I mean read
carefully-prepared GOP talking points off a teleprompter. Dick Cheney
(4) heads up a list of other conservatives who went way off the deep
end last week, with Jimmy Swaggart (6) following close behind.
Elsewhere, the Rather Haters (7,8) are gleefully shutting down the
last remnants of real investigative journalism, and the rest of The
Media (9) are licking their chops at the prospect of the upcoming
presidential debates. And what would the Top Ten be without Bill
O'Reilly? (10) Enjoy...
1 George W. Bush two-faced two-faced two-faced two-faced two-faced
John Kerry is telling the truth about what's happening in Iraq, and if
there's one thing the Bush Boys don't like, it's truth-telling. Last
week an editorial in the Washington Post said that recent accounts of
events in Iraq are "bland to the point of dishonesty." Wrote the Post,
"Not only has Mr. Bush not said how, or whether, he intends to respond
to the worsening situation - he doesn't really admit it exists. This
duck-and-cover strategy may have its political advantages, but it is
also deeply irresponsible and potentially dangerous." Bush's two-faced
approach to Iraq is indeed dangerous. First he said there were weapons
of mass destruction, and there weren't. Then he said there were
connections between Iraq and al Qaeda, and there weren't (even the
State Department didn't think so). And now he says that democracy is
on the way in Iraq, and everything is just peachy-keen there. News
flash: it isn't. At the time of writing, September is the fifth worst
month for American soldiers in Iraq, with 63 service members killed
there since the end of August. Overall more than 135 foreigners have
been kidnapped - several have been beheaded this month alone. But Bush
is clearly living on his own little fantasy planet. Last week he said,
"I saw a poll that said the right-track/wrong-track in Iraq was better
than here in America." You know, I'm not sure what's more disturbing
about that statement - Bush pretending that Iraqis think they're
heading in the right direction, or Bush being proud of the fact that
Iraqis are more confident about the future of Iraq than Americans are
about America. Still not delusional enough for you? On Fox News last
week, Bush was asked whether he would still put on a flight suit and
make the Mission Accomplished speech. 900 dead soldiers later, Bush's
response was "absolutely." And Our Great Leader also brushed off a
recent CIA National Intelligence Estimate which claimed that scenarios
in Iraq ranged from "shitty" to "wow-that's-shitty," saying that just
a "handful" of terrorists are operating in Iraq (despite Iraqi Prime
Minister Ayad Allawi saying last week that terrorists are "pouring
in"), and that the CIA was just "guessing." Oh, well, gee - guessing?
I feel so much better.
2 Ayad Allawi excessive spin excessive spin partisanship
Here's an odd thing - Ayad Allawi did say recently that terrorists are
"pouring" into Iraq. Yet, oddly, when he held a joint press conference
with George W. Bush at the White House last week, he'd completely
changed his tune. The Associated Press reported that "Iraqi Prime
Minister Ayad Allawi sees a bright future for Iraqi democracy,
brushing aside skeptics who say elections set for January may be
truncated or canceled altogether because of violence." Unfortunately
one of those skeptics is Donald Rumsfeld (remember him?) who said last
week that elections may not take place in areas where violence is too
great. Like, you know... Baghdad... and, um... the entire Sunni
Triangle. And most of the rest of the country. Said Rumsfeld, "You
have an election that's not quite perfect. Is it better than not
having an election? You bet." You bet indeed. But getting back to
Allawi... it certainly appears that Team Bush had him well prepped to
stay "on message," as he continued to repeat the kind of rhetoric that
other Republican leaders (I'm looking at you, Dick Cheney) have had to
back away from in recent weeks. He told Jim Lehrer, "Well, I assure
you if Saddam was still there, terrorists will be hitting there again
at Washington and New York, as they did in the murderous attack in
September; they'll be hitting also on other places in Europe and the
Middle East." In other words, elect George Bush or you'll all be blown
to smithereens. Never mind the fact that Saddam had nothing to do with
9/11, had no weapons of mass destruction, and didn't even have an army
to speak of. Deposing him was the right thing to do - although having
a plan to make things work after deposing him appears to have been
just slightly overlooked.
3 George W. Bush and Ayad Allawi two-faced excessive spin photo-opping
Last week two-faced Bush told a bald-faced lie about John Kerry at
several campaign appearances. Bush claimed that, "Incredibly, this
week, my opponent said he would prefer the dictatorship of Saddam
Hussein to the situation in Iraq today." Except that's not what John
Kerry said at all. What Kerry actually said was this: "Saddam Hussein
was a brutal dictator who deserves his own special place in hell. But
that was not, that was not, in and of itself, a reason to go to war."
Hmm. But while we're on the subject of preferring dictatorships, you
might be interested to know that the man Bush installed as Prime
Minister of Iraq and invited to the White House and Congress last
week, apparently used to be an assassin for Saddam Hussein, and helped
Saddam get into power in the first place. Not only that, but his
medical degree was allegedly "conferred upon him by the Baath party,"
and he was recently accused of personally executing several Iraqi
insurgents. According to the Sydney Morning Herald, "he threatens
martial law; he warns he might shut down sections of the media; he
suggests he might delay elections. His Justice Minister is bringing
back the death penalty; his Defense Minister warns he'll chop off
insurgents' hands and heads." So if you're looking for free and fair
elections in Iraq, you'll probably have better luck looking in
Florida. And that's saying something.
4 Dick Cheney lying excessive spin warmongering
But you'd better think twice if you want to tell the truth about Ayad
Allawi and the situation in Iraq - because if you do, look out! Dick
Cheney is on the rampage, and it's not a pretty sight. Cheney blasted
John Kerry last week for the heinous crime of truth-telling, saying he
was "appalled" by Kerry's "lack of respect" for Allawi. What's that,
Dick? You've brought Saddam's former assassin over to act as a prop
for your election campaign, and Kerry isn't allowed to mention that
you're telling fibs about every single aspect of the Iraqi
misadventure? Get off your high horse. Cheney went on: "John Kerry is
trying to tear down all the good that has been accomplished, and his
words are destructive to our effort in Iraq and in the global war on
terror." What bullshit. Here's the truth, Dick: you and George fucked
Iraq up but good, and now you can't fix it. So rather than tell the
truth about what's happening over there, you're endangering us, the
Iraqi people, and the rest of the world by lying, spinning, and
creating bizarre fantasies about the situation there. This is how you
got us into Iraq in the first place, and this is the only way you know
how to deal with it.
5 Team Bush excessive spin excessive spin excessive spin
Waaaah! Team Bush, reeling from John Kerry's recent tough attacks on
President Two-Face's mishandling of Iraq and the war on terror, have
come up with the lamest campaign idea ever - they're saying John Kerry
is COPYING George W. Bush! Jeez, guys, why don't you tell the teacher?
"Mrs. Jones, Mrs. Jones! John Kerry is COPYING me!" Kerry said last
week that Iraq was a "profound diversion" from hunting down al Qaeda,
and promised, "I will never take my eye off the ball." In response,
"the Bush-Cheney campaign said Kerry is 'copying' Bush's anti-terror
plan, even as he attacks the way Bush is waging that fight," according
to NBC News 10. Odd - it seems to me that if Kerry really was copying
Bush he'd be lying to everyone about the progress being made in Iraq,
fabricating stories about how invading Iraq was vital to preventing
another 9/11, and making stuff up about the Iraqi people throwing
flowers at the feet of our soldiers before dashing hand-in-hand to the
polls in January. Doesn't sound like Kerry is copying Bush to me.
6 Jimmy Swaggart homophobia homophobia homophobia homophobia
homophobia
But let's leave the serious topics behind now and get onto some more
lighthearted entertainment. Last week serial prostitute-procurer Jimmy
Swaggart said on his popular television show, "I've never seen a man
in my life I wanted to marry. And I'm going to be blunt and plain: If
one ever looks at me like that, I'm going to kill him and tell God he
died." Wait a second - that doesn't sound very lighthearted. But don't
worry, it's okay - see, Swaggart later clarified his position, saying
his comments were "meant to be a joke." Oh, a-ha ha ha! I get it now!
It's all a big joke! Man, don't you just love it when evangelist
preachers make jokes about killing homosexuals? Hoo-boy. Swaggart made
the remarks to "applause and laughs" during a televised sermon, but
has since apologized, saying "I am totally opposed to any type of
violence against anyone." He added, "Everyone except gay men, that is.
I'd kill them." He further added, "Just a joke, get it?" He concluded,
"Does anyone know where I can get a hooker 'round here?"
7 Rather Haters hypocrisy hypocrisy excessive spin
The outcry over the infamous CBS memos has reached truly ridiculous
proportions. For some reason it seems that these memos - which were
not even central to the story of Bush going AWOL from the National
Guard - are now THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD. And the utter
hypocrisy of the right-wing spin machine is, in my opinion, about to
create some kind of dangerous rip in the space-time continuum. Take
this quote from Mike Krempasky, who set up Rathergate.com. Before you
read it, pretend that he's talking about George W. Bush and the way
this administration invaded Iraq based on politicized and profoundly
wrong intelligence, leading us into a poorly-managed occupation which
has taken the lives of thousands upon thousands of people. Okay? Here
we go: "The buck has to stop ... He's certainly the face of the story.
He's the one who sneered at anyone who dared criticize him on the
story for 10 days. He's the one who put his credibility on the line
when he said he believed in the story." Except he's not talking about
George W. Bush, he's talking about Dan Rather. Has the world gone
completely insane? Meanwhile, some media corporations have removed CBS
from their radio stations' broadcast schedules, allegedly because of
listener uproar. "We had so much outcry from our listeners. They were
calling and complaining and saying they wouldn't listen to a CBS
newscast anymore," said Lisa Sinclair, general manager of Sinclair
Communications. "This is a conservative market, and people felt that
CBS was exhibiting a great deal of liberal bias and lost credibility
with this situation." By the way, if the name Sinclair rings a bell,
it's because they're a bunch of right-wing nutjobs who were featured
back in Idiots 154 when they refused to air Nightline's special
broadcast honoring soldiers killed in Iraq. So you can bet they were
really disappointed about getting rid of Dan Rather. I bet they took
all of, I dunno, two calls before they caved.
8 Rather Haters (again) pandering partisanship
Unfortunately, the fact is that the pressure the Rather Haters are
putting on CBS is paying off - last week CBS announced that are
shelving a report on Iraq's lack of weapons of mass destruction. Why?
Because apparently it would be "inappropriate" to air it so close to
an election. Inappropriate? So how long does the media have to stop
reporting the news before an election? Six weeks? Seven? I didn't
realize there was a statute of limitations on this kind of thing. Add
to that the fact that the CEO of CBS's parent company Viacom announced
last week that he was a Bush supporter, and you have a very nice
squeeze that the right-wingers are putting on CBS. So all you
reporters who still believe in the power of investigative journalism,
I'm afraid your days are numbered. Now please, everyone return to your
TV sets and watch the talking heads shout at one another. It's
thoroughly uninformative and it's not very entertaining, but with the
election just over a month away we certainly wouldn't want the media
to rock the boat by reporting actual news stories, would we?
9 The Media partisanship excessive spin excessive spin excessive spin
excessive spin
With the first of the presidential debates scheduled for this
Thursday, I think it's important to put things in perspective. First
of all, forget about all this low expectations bullcrap. When it comes
to public speaking, George Bush is pathetic. Kerry will wipe the floor
with him without even breaking a sweat. HOWEVER, this does not
necessarily mean that Kerry will win the debates. In fact, Kerry's
chances are slim, and here's why: the following handy list comes
courtesy of DUer Sparkly, and is a concise summary of what will happen
after each presidential debate. Keep this list handy on September
30th, and see how many of these pundit points YOU can spot when the
debate ends!
KERRY If he's serious - they'll say he's glum, gloomy, pessimistic,
and uninspiring.
If he's jovial - they'll say he's phony and trying too hard.
BUSH If he's serious - he's presidential, the war-time commander in
chief.
If he's jovial- everybody wants to have a beer with him.
[ghost.gif] [ghost.gif]
KERRY If he's forceful - they'll say he's too aggressive, mean,
negative, desperate.
If he's calm - they'll say he's weak, unsteady, dull, lacks energy.
BUSH If he's forceful - they'll say he's strong, resolute, unwavering.
If he's calm - they'll say he's prepared, on-message, disciplined,
reserved.
[ghost.gif] [ghost.gif]
KERRY If he's specific - they'll say he's wonkish, presenting "laundry
lists," being overly-intellectual, show-offy, and nobody likes the
smart kid.
If he's not specific - they'll say he's vague, criticizing but not
offering solutions, not addressing the issues, and nobody knows who he
is.
BUSH If he's specific - they'll say he "lays out his plan" and "makes
his case."
If he's not specific - they'll say he's spanning the issues, giving a
global presentation, painting a broad outline of his plans.
[ghost.gif] [ghost.gif]
KERRY If he jokes - they'll say he lacks gravitas, trivializes
important issues, doesn't understand troops are in harm's way,
nation's at war, disrespects the president, etc.
If he doesn't joke - they'll say he needs to lighten up, he's too
stoney, he's wooden.
BUSH If he jokes - they'll say he's a man of the people, a regular
guy, people relate to him.
If he doesn't joke - they'll say he truly cares about the American
people and his sincerity resonates with voters in this difficult time.
Plus, if Bush finds his podium and doesn't trip on his way to it, he's
surpassed all expectations. (Extra points for correct pronunciation of
"Abu Ghraib" or "nuclear.")
10 Bill O'Reilly massive ego massive ego massive ego dumb
And finally, there's intriguing news from the world of one of our
favorite conservative idiots, Bill O'Reilly. After his recent stellar
rebuttal of Mr. Jack Mehoffer (see Idiots 170), it seems that Bill is
starting to think bigger than Fox News prime-time. So, what's next for
the blotchiest loudmouth on television? Well, it seems that Mr.
O'Reilly may be contemplating politics as a job rather than simply a
tool to annoy people. That's right - our Bill may well be planning to
run for the United States Senate. But don't get too excited - if Bill
does take the plunge he'll be going toe-to-toe with Hillary Clinton,
so his plunge could well end up being a long, screaming plummet,
followed by a loud splash and then a sort of gurgling sound. Insiders
aren't sure why O'Reilly would want a seat in the Senate, but it's
possible that he's trying to break Alan Keyes' current record for
Worst Senate Candidate Of All Time. Although if it does happen, I
can't wait for him to try to tell Hillary to "shut up, shut up, just
shut up" during the debates. He'll be picking his teeth up off the
floor. See you next week!
Linked cites verifying the aforementioned idiots can be found at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/index.html
_____________________________________________________________________
Medals earned by Kerry: 3 Purple Hearts
1 Silver Star
1 Bronze Star
Medals earned by Bush : 0
______________________________________
Bush - 3 arrests, 1 conviction.
Cheney - 2 arrests, 2 convictions.
Clinton - 0 arrests, 0 convictions.
___________________________________
Re: Top 10N YX SPAM OGF THE NIGHT!
Author: Serious Sam
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:05
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:05
19 lines
1974 bytes
1974 bytes
In Your Dreams wrote: > The Top 10 NYX SPAM OF THE NIGHT! http://www.nojohnkerry.org/kerryhtml/issues/guncontrol.htm Kerry is Anti-2nd Amendment Kerry consistently receives an F rating from the NRA Democratic Party shouldn't be for the NRA. (Nov 2003) Supports assault weapons ban & Brady Bill. (Oct 2003) Voted YES on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999) Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999) Voted NO on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. (May 1999) Voted NO on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998) Prevent unauthorized firearm use with "smart gun" technology. (Aug 2000) Kerry Voted No on all Centerfire Ammo
Re: Top 10N YX SPAM OGF THE NIGHT!
Author: Ken Smith
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:40
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:40
41 lines
2926 bytes
2926 bytes
Serious Sam wrote: > In Your Dreams wrote: > >> The Top 10 NYX SPAM OF THE NIGHT! > > http://www.nojohnkerry.org/kerryhtml/issues/guncontrol.htm > Kerry is Anti-2nd Amendment > Kerry consistently receives an F rating from the NRA Former district attorneys and cops tend to be like that. Even the Republicans. > Democratic Party shouldn't be for the NRA. (Nov 2003) > Supports assault weapons ban & Brady Bill. (Oct 2003) Uh, so did Bush.... > Voted YES on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999) And this is a bad idea why? It's easy enough for a violent felon to get a gun -- would you want to make it easier? > Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999) William F. Buckley would agree -- he thinks we've lost the war on drugs, and ought to have the good sense to admit it. > Voted NO on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. (May 1999) > Voted NO on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. > (Jul 1998) > Prevent unauthorized firearm use with "smart gun" technology. (Aug 2000) > Kerry Voted No on all Centerfire Ammo Sam, while I am all for the Second Amendment, we still have to decide where the line ought to be drawn. The Iraqi insurgency shows how well a heavily-armed populace can stand up against an occupation army -- and if our intended goal is to have the means necessary to protect our liberty, we should be as well-armed as they are. Would you support the public sale of RPGs? Stinger missiles? Where do we draw the line?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads