🚀 go-pugleaf

Here we go again....
***denote my rebuttals***



"Travis Bickle" <bushis@dope.net> wrote in message
news:%kCX5.179$d62.10208@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> "~~Ace**" <Raceace24@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:VZzX5.176069$td5.25228169@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
> > Aside from more than likely taking the one part of the story out of
> context,
> > (which is what most liberals do anyway, because they lack the patience &
> > intelligence to read a story from beginning to end) how is it that one
> > policeman's action can be blamed on the Governor of the state he happens
> to
> > work in?
>
> 1.  The article was copied from the AP in its entirety; it wasn't taken
out
> of context.

**Did the conclusion the the state was a banana republic also appear in the
story, or was this miraculous assertion formed by your pea brain?**

> 2.  That kind of abuse of power is pretty typical of the state as a whole.

***Oh, & you live there, & now this to be a fact based on first hand
information, right?****

> Texans in positions of power are generally lazy (e.g. Henry B. Gonzales-30
> years in Congress without introducing a single piece of legislation),
> self-aggrandizing, and full of excuses.

***Better than being full of shit, like yourself...***

> 3.  It wasn't one policeman's action--it is the state law. You can spend
the
> night in the Texas hoosegow and get a blot on your record merely for
driving
> around with a burned-out tail light.

***And there are no Dumbocrats in the State Legislature to block such an
unfair law?
Or were they busy authoring & introducing other pieces of legislation, & not
paying attention to the details?***


> 4. You obviously need to label others choose to disagree with your high
> opinion of yourself.

****No..... asshole describes you perfectly...****


At least you didn't throw out the hackneyed, typical
> (for Texans, anyway) "commie" label.
> 5.  Doctrinaires exist at both ends of the political spectrum. People who
> identify themselves as liberals, conservatives, or libertarians, find it
> much easier to adhere to rigid beliefs rather than think for themselves.
>
>
*****You haven't a clue do you? It is high standards that set people such as
myself apart from fools such as yourself.....*****



> > I know you can't answer that intelligently, so let's proceed....
>
> You know nothing.

*****I know plenty.*****



  Read on...
>
> > My guess is that the woman either was high, drunk, or stupid enough to
> give
> > the cop a hard time, & in turn, got to ride in the pretty black & white
> car
> > with the big red light on top.
>
> Your guess notwithstanding, the article said nothing about her being
drunk,
> high, or belligerent. As a matter of fact, another article in a local
Texas
> paper said she was cruising through Lago Vista, TX at 15 mph with three
> children, a bag of charcoal, a tricycle and soccer gear. She was returning
> from a soccer outing and was arrested in front of her crying children.
>
*****If you believe that there is nothing more to this story than the
miniscule amount of info that you furnished, I would say that you are rather
gullible, or too shallow to look further & get the whole story, either way,
you don't strike me as the sharpest pencil on the desk....*****



> > And have you ever seen a sucker mom try to navigate your local mall
> parking
> > lot in one of those huge behemoth SUV's ? She probably took out ten cars
> > right before she was pulled over by the cop.
>
> Your moronic anecdote just proved what a complete jackass you are.

*****Comic relief, poopy butt...a little too subtle for your intelect, I
guess...*****

>
> > Cops are all bad, & criminals are all innocent victims of the police
> > state...
>
> Wrong. I'm generally on the side of the police.  However, in this case,
the
> law needs to be changed

****So cry about the Dumbocratically controlled Texas State Legislature who
write the laws, not the Governor who has to enforce the laws.... God, are
you THAT stupid????????******


.  Unless you're a complete pollyanna, it is plain
> that a law such as the one in Texas is wide open to abuse.


****You truly have an uncanny grasp of the obvious....DUH?****



 The wrong
> decision by the US Supreme Court will enable other states to enact similar
> laws. That kind of power isn't really necessary for maintaining order.
Can
> you say " Banana Republic"?

****Yes, can you say clueless fool????*****


>
> > One day, I'd like to see your liberal, long haired, tie dyed, pot
smoking,
> > authority questioning ass out there on the streets trying to police the
> > masses.
>
> Really?  What about us short-haired, middle-aged, teetotaling white collar
> types?  Never mind.  Many of us are already your bosses--or cops.
>

****I have no boss, I own a business with a lot of short-haired,
middle-aged, teetotalling types such as yourself as my employees.....*****


> > At that point, your viewpoint may actually be worth considering, but for
> > now, that is not the case.
>
> <Remainder of sophomoric diatribe deleted for clarity>

****Just as I had mentioned previously, lack of patince, or intelligence to
even finish the debate...***



>
> > ~~Ace**
> >
> Maybe ~~Ass** would be a better moniker for you...
>
> ****With a name like Travis, it would be redundant to make fun of THAT
name...*****
>
>