🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:41:14 -0500, Art Clemons
<artclemons@aolSPAM.com> wrote:

I was going to ignore your postings, due to the fact that you cannot
manage to set your follow-ups or set your line lengths. You are either
too stupid to know how, or you are intentionally trimming your
follow-ups to subdue the responses for your posts. However, this post
gives me an opportunity to slam your dumb ass.

>Mike Smith wrote:
>
>> Liberals simply cannot understand facts, logic, common sense,
>> analytical analysis, and any type of critical thought process.  If I
>> wanted you to understand, I'd put it in terms you could understand.
>> I'd put the facts into some sort of an emotional appeal, so you could
>> eventually understand. No emotional impact = no understand. I know
>> this; you don't.
>
>
>Gee, and where is your analysis that demonstrates that an Ivy League education makes one intelligent?  

In today's environment, it doesn't. Back in the 1970's, before the
classes were dumbed down to the lowest common denominator by
affirmative action, a "C" did indicate intelligence. 


>You don't even know for example what standards of legacy admission GWB met at yale, 
>or how relatively uncompetitive admission was to Ivy MBA programs was when dumbya went to Harvard.  

That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Bush did earn a
"C" average at Yale & Harvard. Are you intentionally trying to divert
the discussion into a non-issue, or are you just too dumb to
comprehend the issue? Hard to tell, based on your posts...
>
>I ask once again, what evidence you have that you are presenting logic, common sensed or any type of critical thought process.  

It's right there in front of your dumbassed face. Too bad you have
difficulty understanding what you are reading.

>Incidentally, it's a good bet I do know what an Ivy education is like.

Based on your posts, that would be a sucker's bet. I don't think you
have the first clue.

Mike Smith