🚀 go-pugleaf

mcs wrote:
>.. For instance, if we had cameras that were able to see
> the head of a penny from space in early 70s how is it we can't defeat
> terrorists who have no army persay, no organized communication system, no
> airforce and  no armored tanks?

Guerrilla wars sometimes succeed. Guerrillas are very ruthless. They
murder without mercy teachers, officials, police, doctors or anyone who
opposes them; anyone who represents the 'established order'.

I'm sure we could stop the Iraq insurgency. But I expect it requires
the same kind of ruthlessness practiced by insurgents. We don't have
that kind of will. For example, Saddam basically wiped out Kurdish and
Shiite towns to stop insurgencies. We could easily wipe out Baghdad and
the surviving insurgents would reconsider their efforts. But we will
not.


Its the same for pollution, tell them you
> know exactly how and how much poison people are made to inhale why don't
> they do something about it? These questions will never be asked which makes
> you wonder about the types of freedoms we really have. The thing is when
> they decide to kill people to maintain jobs for others thats when citizens
> should know they crossed the line. The pharmacy industry and energy
> companies now can get away with murdering people because they promote jobs
> for those in power Yet how many Americans would believe all this?


I don't see any industry murdering people. I always had the impression
that pharmacy industry seeks to saves lives and energy companies
provide energy. What would we do without either?