🚀 go-pugleaf

"Karen Y Byrd" <kybyrd@pobox.upenn.edu> wrote in message 
news:slrnea4tom.nmt.kybyrd@pobox.upenn.edu...
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:25:01 GMT, mcs <mcs@nspam.net> wrote:
>>nothing like having the best athletes in the world practicing and 
>>competing
>>in warning level air..OOPs better not rationalize that...
>
> They'll be in Beijing before long breathing some of the worse air

Each organization has its own agenda, but I would side with the one on 
safety and thats the thing I don't understand . It would be one thing if I 
complained and I might be wrong, but I think all the links I provided shows 
I am right for the most part. Whats interesting is how our air can sometimes 
be decent and why. It seems like when the air comes from southwest or 
stagnant its horrible for air quality but if it shifts from southeast ( 
ocean) we tend to get a bit better air then they do from the wst of us. We 
have 8 days of constant bad air last week and around 3 so far of decent air 
some in the good zone. I give thanks for each day of good air and I think I 
have good reason to hope others in this area ask our leaders to provide the 
same for the rest of our population. Remember on airnow website, it says 
quality of air equals quality of life. If only the Supreme Court can agree 
or dare I suggest our President.
> ever recorded.
>
> Why can't you use some perspective about this? Don't say, "Well, I(or we) 
> don't
> live in China.", when you continue to use "the everything is connected
> to pollution" mantra.
>
> You're credibility will increase if you discuss issues about it
> world-wide. It's not just a local problem!