🚀 go-pugleaf

"XTS" <xts@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4l9we.21498$7X1.7669@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>
> "mcs" <mcs@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:H49we.12733$bz6.12190@trndny06...
> > just think if our enemy had a real army of missles and a real army of
> > advanced weapons and communications,. Pretty sad we can't beat these
> people
> > isn't it?
>
>
> It's not a matter of "beating" them. It's a matter of occupation. If we
> wanted to just "beat" them we would have done, by any means necessary.

Um how about just following where they come from and train. Obviously they
are not all training and getting bombs individually . If we can find on
genetic molecule out of billions and train people to fly to moon and Mars
surely we can follow people without advanced transportation  from whence
they came and annihilate their sources.. sorry for spelling its early.


>
> Harry Truman, decided it was time to just "beat" the Japanese once and for
> all, , and it was so.
> Boom once. Boom twice.  War over.
>
> But an invasion, and protraced occupation takes a simple "beating" off the
> table.  Contractors are making billions.  The more that is destroyed, the
> more they have to rebuild. The more the insurgents spread, the more
private
> security contracts are handed out. The more oil fileds are sabotaged, the
> more private security money is pumped into  it.
>

B I N G O


> Bush and company knew, there would never be flowers and candy. They knew
the
> only "mission acomplished" was the invasion, and the occupation was under
> way. They knew Radical Islam would appear to try and control Iraq after we
> they defeated the Republican Guard. They counted on it, so we could have a
> reason to stay, build permanent Militray Bases, put in a Green Zone, and
let
> the blood flow.
>
> They always knew where to go and grab Saddam. They just did it to early in
> the campaign. They played a big card to early.
>
> American casualties are nothing to them, but an essential part of their
> plan. They dont give a damn about how many innocent people they slaughter,
> because they think they will never have to answer for them, other than
> saying "shit happens.
>
> "Beating these people" would be the easy part. The hard part is coming up
> with excuses why we arent, and why we wont, and explaining why it will
take
> 5, 8, 10, 12 years to happen.
>
> Bagdhad Central Command, will be a good, safe zone, while the reats of the
> country stays in chaos.
>
> During the Vietnam War, we had some places where you could go, and not
> realize there was a war going on. When the American military puts the
"fix"
> in, it comes with a lot of experience.
>
>   Yeah and so you are the only one saying this in Press. Whats this say
about our Press too?
Pretty soon you will have people telling you they have you in killfile. Too
much sense

>
>
> > "Bradley K. Sherman" <bks@panix.com> wrote in message
> > news:d9qgbu$nsl$1@panix2.panix.com...
> > >
> > >  >


"mcs" <mcs@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Mgawe.17713$cz6.8187@trndny07...
> just think if our enemy had a real army of missles and a real army of
> > advanced weapons and communications,. Pretty sad we can't beat these
> people
> > isn't it?
>
>
> It's not a matter of "beating" them. It's a matter of occupation. If we
> wanted to just "beat" them we would have done, by any means necessary.
>
> Harry Truman, decided it was time to just "beat" the Japanese once and for
> all, , and it was so.
> Boom once. Boom twice.  War over.
>
> But an invasion, and protraced occupation takes a simple "beating" off the
> table.  Contractors are making billions.  The more that is destroyed, the
> more they have to rebuild. The more the insurgents spread, the more
private
> security contracts are handed out. The more oil fileds are sabotaged, the
> more private security money is pumped into  it.
>
> Bush and company knew, there would never be flowers and candy. They knew
the
> only "mission acomplished" was the invasion, and the occupation was under
> way. They knew Radical Islam would appear to try and control Iraq after we
> they defeated the Republican Guard. They counted on it, so we could have a
> reason to stay, build permanent Militray Bases, put in a Green Zone, and
let
> the blood flow.
>
> They always knew where to go and grab Saddam. They just did it to early in
> the campaign. They played a big card to early.
>
> American casualties are nothing to them, but an essential part of their
> plan. They dont give a damn about how many innocent people they slaughter,
> because they think they will never have to answer for them, other than
> saying "shit happens.
>
> "Beating these people" would be the easy part. The hard part is coming up
> with excuses why we arent, and why we wont, and explaining why it will
take
> 5, 8, 10, 12 years to happen.
>
> Bagdhad Central Command, will be a good, safe zone, while the reats of the
> country stays in chaos.
>
> During the Vietnam War, we had some places where you could go, and not
> realize there was a war going on. When the American military puts the
"fix"
> in, it comes with a lot of experience.
>
>
>
>
> > "Bradley K. Sherman" <bks@panix.com> wrote in message
> > news:d9qgbu$nsl$1@panix2.panix.com...
> > >
> > >  | ...
> > >  | The AH-64 crashed in Mishahda, 20 miles north of the capital,
> > >  | and witness Mohammed Naji told Associated Press Television
> > >  | News he saw two helicopters flying toward Mishahda when "a
> > >  | rocket hit one of them and destroyed it completely in the air."
> > >  | ...
> > >
<http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-06-27-copter-crash_x.htm>
> > >
> > >     --bks
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> "John H. Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1119956625.868033.57750@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > "Terrorist"!!!  What other description do we have for one who would
> > invade a sovereign nation, under false pretenses, and blame it on
> > "insurgents", and others, who are without guilt???
> >
>
>