Thread View: phl.media
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by John H Fisher
Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:22
Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: John H Fisher
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:22
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:22
24 lines
3133 bytes
3133 bytes
Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved? Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US involvement. The captured "hired" terrorist, it seems, is from New Jersey. A "False Flag" operation is not out of the mix. There are any # of warmongering groups/nations which could be interested in fomenting unrest between India & Pakistan. Friday, December 5, 2008 at 12:04AM "If the Mumbai terrorists' background was consistent with the single captured survivor, then the terrorist actions were not performed by Muslims, but by mercenaries, that is soldiers of fortune, hired criminals, paid to murder and terrorize, for non-religious reasons, and funded by unknown criminal gangs for purposes also unknown. The obvious motivation of such gangs might be to encourage political instability in the region, and heighten military and diplomatic pressure on the government of Pakistan. This certainly suggests that the criminal gangs who hired the mercenary terrorists in Mumbai, were like their soldiers, motivated also by financial gain, as criminal gangs tend to be so engaged, and that the gangs themselves were hired by perhaps non-Pakistani actors, with ambitions for control of the government of Pakistan." Complete article may be found here: http://www.julaybib.com/anomaly-briefs/2008/12/5/mumbai-was-it-indeed-an-islamic-terror-attack-were-muslims-e.html
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: duke
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:23
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:23
14 lines
1511 bytes
1511 bytes
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:22:59 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> wrote: >Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved? >Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US >involvement. Here's good news for you, fishboy. The one live attacker says Pakistani Islamic terrorism was the villain. The Dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: John H Fisher
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:21
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:21
19 lines
2498 bytes
2498 bytes
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:5irkj457q3paaukl2hlm11mi7d93415e08@4ax.com... > On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:22:59 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> > wrote: > >>Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even >>Involved? >>Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US >>involvement. > > Here's good news for you, fishboy. The one live attacker says Pakistani > Islamic > terrorism was the villain. > ***** ****We all know that you believe everything you read, Dukie!!! I doubt that this mercenary would know the primary source of his motivators!!! They could even be some bible thumpers.
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: duke
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:13
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:13
29 lines
2266 bytes
2266 bytes
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:33 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> wrote: > >"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >news:5irkj457q3paaukl2hlm11mi7d93415e08@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:22:59 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>>Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even >>>Involved? >>>Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US >>>involvement. >> >> Here's good news for you, fishboy. The one live attacker says Pakistani >> Islamic >> terrorism was the villain. >***** ****We all know that you believe everything you read, Dukie!!! I >doubt that this mercenary would know the primary source of his motivators!!! >They could even be some bible thumpers. No, I don't read anything you write. You don't even know what the others involved have said. The Dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: John H Fisher
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:39
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:39
33 lines
3074 bytes
3074 bytes
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:t3glj4tq8lm207e1khrrpbchjar57ph7np@4ax.com... > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:33 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> > wrote: > >> >>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:5irkj457q3paaukl2hlm11mi7d93415e08@4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:22:59 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even >>>>Involved? >>>>Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US >>>>involvement. >>> >>> Here's good news for you, fishboy. The one live attacker says Pakistani >>> Islamic >>> terrorism was the villain. > >>***** ****We all know that you believe everything you read, Dukie!!! I >>doubt that this mercenary would know the primary source of his >>motivators!!! >>They could even be some bible thumpers. > > No, I don't read anything you write. You don't even know what the others > involved have said. > ****Duke, whatever you are trying to say, above, makes absolutely no sense??? You read nothing I write??? What others "involved" are you talking about???
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: duke
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:27
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:27
46 lines
2902 bytes
2902 bytes
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:39:23 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> wrote: > >"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >news:t3glj4tq8lm207e1khrrpbchjar57ph7np@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:33 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:5irkj457q3paaukl2hlm11mi7d93415e08@4ax.com... >>>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:22:59 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even >>>>>Involved? >>>>>Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US >>>>>involvement. >>>> >>>> Here's good news for you, fishboy. The one live attacker says Pakistani >>>> Islamic >>>> terrorism was the villain. >> >>>***** ****We all know that you believe everything you read, Dukie!!! I >>>doubt that this mercenary would know the primary source of his >>>motivators!!! >>>They could even be some bible thumpers. >> >> No, I don't read anything you write. You don't even know what the others >> involved have said. >> > >****Duke, whatever you are trying to say, above, makes absolutely no >sense??? You read nothing I write??? What others "involved" are you >talking about??? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7764475.stm The group that attacked Mumbai may well include some Pakistanis, but it is more likely to be an international terrorist force put together by al-Qaeda and the Pakistani Taleban The Dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: John H Fisher
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:57
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:57
73 lines
4979 bytes
4979 bytes
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:5njnj4l86osljct55dljfe7s4haojs4218@4ax.com... > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:39:23 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> > wrote: > >> >>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:t3glj4tq8lm207e1khrrpbchjar57ph7np@4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:33 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>news:5irkj457q3paaukl2hlm11mi7d93415e08@4ax.com... >>>>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:22:59 -0500, "John H Fisher" >>>>> <TaxService@aol.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even >>>>>>Involved? >>>>>>Are we too quick to judge??? For all we know, it could be Israeli/US >>>>>>involvement. >>>>> >>>>> Here's good news for you, fishboy. The one live attacker says >>>>> Pakistani >>>>> Islamic >>>>> terrorism was the villain. >>> >>>>***** ****We all know that you believe everything you read, Dukie!!! I >>>>doubt that this mercenary would know the primary source of his >>>>motivators!!! >>>>They could even be some bible thumpers. >>> >>> No, I don't read anything you write. You don't even know what the >>> others >>> involved have said. >>> >> >>****Duke, whatever you are trying to say, above, makes absolutely no >>sense??? You read nothing I write??? What others "involved" are you >>talking about??? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7764475.stm > The group that attacked Mumbai may well include some Pakistanis, but it is > more > likely to be an international terrorist force put together by al-Qaeda and > the > Pakistani Taleban > ***The article implies that al-Qaeda is at the root and that both India & Pakistan are being duped, by outside forces, to engage in war. You appear to be agreeing with me in questioning the source which may not be Pakistan. The articles don't answer the question initiated by the intent of this thread!!! The U.S. has been known to finance, and endorse, al-Qaeda activities. Getting to the root of sources is far from being an easy task. Considering the illegal act committed by the Bush administration in going to war with a sovereign nation, which presented no clear and present danger to this once greater nation, seems to be pushing India to act in the same way and is worthy of scrutiny. (MNSVHO) A false flag operation is more likely than not. Israel is now up to its neck in readying India for an all out attack on India. http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5760 As happened with Carter, when Reagan was a candidate , and a deal with Iran, made by Republicans (false flag kind of thing) prisoners were held until the moment Reagan was sworn into office. What troubles me is that Israel will have its hand in some kind of act, as Obama is sworn in, which will plunge the world into new wars. It would surprise me that, as Obama is being sworn in, Israel bombs the hell out of Iran, or creates other forms of havoc, just to test Obama.
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: John H Fisher
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:17
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:17
38 lines
3985 bytes
3985 bytes
copy edited to change would to "wouldn't" in last paragraph. >>>****Duke, whatever you are trying to say, above, makes absolutely no >>>sense??? You read nothing I write??? What others "involved" are you >>>talking about??? >> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7764475.stm >> The group that attacked Mumbai may well include some Pakistanis, but it >> is more >> likely to be an international terrorist force put together by al-Qaeda >> and the >> Pakistani Taleban >> > ***The article implies that al-Qaeda is at the root and that both India & > Pakistan are being duped, by outside forces, to engage in war. > > You appear to be agreeing with me in questioning the source which may not > be Pakistan. The articles don't answer the question initiated by the > intent of this thread!!! The U.S. has been known to finance, and endorse, > al-Qaeda activities. Getting to the root of sources is far from being an > easy task. Considering the illegal act committed by the Bush > administration in going to war with a sovereign nation, which presented no > clear and present danger to this once greater nation, seems to be pushing > India to act in the same way and is worthy of scrutiny. (MNSVHO) > > A false flag operation is more likely than not. Israel is now up to its > neck in readying India for an all out attack on India. > http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5760 > > As happened with Carter, when Reagan was a candidate , and a deal with > Iran, made by Republicans (false flag kind of thing) prisoners were held > until the moment Reagan was sworn into office. What troubles me is that > Israel will have its hand in some kind of act, as Obama is sworn in, which > will plunge the world into new wars. It wouldn't surprise me that, as > Obama is being sworn in, Israel bombs the hell out of Iran, or creates > other forms of havoc, just to test Obama. > >
Re: Mumbai: Was it Indeed an Islamic Terror Attack? Were Muslims even Involved?
Author: duke
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:54
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:54
25 lines
2220 bytes
2220 bytes
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:57:04 -0500, "John H Fisher" <TaxService@aol.com> wrote: >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7764475.stm >> The group that attacked Mumbai may well include some Pakistanis, but it is >> more >> likely to be an international terrorist force put together by al-Qaeda and >> the >> Pakistani Taleban >***The article implies that al-Qaeda is at the root and that both India & >Pakistan are being duped, by outside forces, to engage in war. Alqueda and the talee-bon are the root, and they are Islamic terrorists. >You appear to be agreeing with me in questioning the source which may not be >Pakistan. Absolutely. The Dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads