🚀 go-pugleaf

Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (shedevil@vix.com) wrote:
: In a recent message malloy@cris.com (Sean Malloy) tells us:
: *fdp@netcom.com (Ciccio) wrote:
: *>Geez Steve, I don't know who all is who on this thread or what they do for a 
: *>living, but I got to agree with you.  Now, if your machine will let you,
: *>go back and look at my first post on this thread.  In essence, I said:
: *>OJ was found NOT GUILTY! and Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ronald Goldaman are
: *>DEAD!   That's that.  
: *
: *You have a selective memory. You _also_ stated that _nothing_ anyone
: *could do could change that. _That_ statement, with specific regard to
: *the trial verdict, is what I objected to. See below, where you repeat
: *the statement.

: *I never disagreed with the two statements of objective fact you made
: *-- that OJ was found not guilty, and that Ron and Nicole are now dead.
: *However, your statement that neither of these could in any way be
: *altered was false-to-fact; while there is no way to change Ron and
: *Nicole's "metabolically challenged" state, a procedure -- albeit
: *unlikely -- exists whereby the country's laws could be changed to
: *permit retrying Simpson, which could achieve a different verdict. It


: Well, actually, no.  You see, our Consitution has that pesky little
: "no ex post facto laws" clause.

Suppose the feds rename murder, "civil rights violation."
Could OJ be retried then?
Legally?
Has this been done before?
In LA?

Howie

: -- 
:    I am: mom, attorney, fathers' rights advocate, founder of F.R.E.E.(tm)
: *--> Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange info: http://www.vix.com/free/
:     To join the Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange:  free-join@vix.com
:  SEEKING:  Alan Banning, Gil Oxley, Andy Potter, & Lorna Taylor (all from MA)