🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <45ovn1$3o3@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>,
Dennis J. Shane  <djshane@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>In <45oscs$29r@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> jon21@ix.netcom.com (jonhoutex )
>writes: 
>>
>>In <45o3lq$fsg@newsbf02.news.aol.com> kenconner@aol.com (KenConner)
>>writes: 
>>>
>>>Did I miss something?  I thought the verdict was not guilty.
>>>
>>>Ken
>>>
>>unless you are blind, deaf and stupid you missed everything. this
>>definitely was a case of  a jury with a cause. not guilty in this t.v.
>>court doesnot mean not guilty in the public court' which for this
>>bastard means everything!
>
>Then why not do away with the entire jury system while we're at it? 
 
 Believe me I'd like to.
 
>Personally, I think he did it, BUT and here's the biggie...  the jury
>followed the Judge's orders to a T...  there was a shadow of a doubt. 
 
 Yea "the evidence just wasn't there". Why anybody can leave blood
at a murder scene. Everybody usually has the blood of the victims in their
car, house, clothing. I'm sure we can all agree that if our spouse had
her head cut off the first thing we'd do is lead the police on a chase
where we had our passports and some cash. Just in case we suddenly found
ourselves in another country or something. Hey everybody beats the fuck out 
of their wives on a regular basis. Just because he threatened to kill her
doesn't mean anything. He was just kidding! Don't ya get it??? Ha ha.
 Doesn't every car have a bodybag sized bag with a shovel in their car??
I always do. DNA? *pshawaaaa* The world was created in 7 days.
 
-Jeem, and pigs fly out my ass.
 
>Actually, there were a few shadows of doubt.  The jury had no choice,
>given the instructions given to them, to find him not guilty.  However,
 
Sure. It's not like the defenses own witness placed his car there. Its
not like he didn't want to tell his story. Its not like he wasn't home when he
said he was. Its not like his own tenants see him out behind the shed
in the middle of the night. Oh yea he was hitting a few moonlight golf balls.

>the civil suits will be different... he can be found guilty by the
>preponderance of the evidence and only 9 out of the 12 have to think
>he's guilty in order to get a conviction...
 
 And only one relative has to decide if his walking around is fair.
 Maybe Cochran can assuage them with tales of slavery 200 years ago.

========================================================================
 Steatopygias's 'R' Us.          doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. AMA#669373 DoD#564. There ain't no more
"For why should my freedom be judged by another's conscience?" --
Paul 1 Corinthians 10:29
========================================================================