🚀 go-pugleaf

>Natasha:

>>I pointed out , however, that he only called me after I sent this
>>insulting message ... before that, I forwarded all kinds of humorous
>>posts, messages, whatever - he rarely responded w/ more than a
>>one-phrase message.  Once I bitched or complained, however,  he
>>responded.
>>And you know what?  He laughed.  And agreed.  
>>To quote: "men have to conquer things, including women.  Once they're
>>nice to you, you know you've won and you have to move on to other
>>things."
>>

Natasha

If we follow your logic to the extreme, then your method of attacting
a man to you, would be to refuse to have anything to do with him,
especially sex!  If he is unable to "conquer" you, then with him being
who he is, he will marry you in order to "conquer" you!  After the
marriage, however you will still say no, in order to keep him, since
all that he wants to do is conquer you!  

No thanks I perfer a mutual agreement, that both of us conquer and
surrender at the same time.  Sometimes she will be the leader and
sometimes I will be the leader!  I don't want a full time slave, nor
do I want to be a slave!  I don't want to conquer anyone, nor do I
want to be conquered!  

I have dated women like you in the past, and each different version of
you, got exactly one date.  Why bother playing headgames?  All you
will find is men that will play head games on you!




Dave Jones

God made some people large and God made
some people small, but Samual Colt made
all people equal!