Article View: pnw.general
Article #1018Re: Seattle City Light vs. Puget Power
From: Phil Hughes
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:34
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:34
20 lines
1439 bytes
1439 bytes
David Ruggiero (osiris@halcyon.com) wrote: : Sorry to both of yous guys, but the main reason that Seattle City light : rates are among the lowest in the country (lower than almost any other : major urban area - this shoots a hole in Mark's argument) is that 50-75% : of their power is supplied by their wholly-owned, fully-amortized, and : (relatively) cheap hydroelectric dams on the Skagit River. Puget Power, : on the other hand, has to either generate its own power using fossil : fuels or buy it at higher (near market) rates from the BPA (with its : newer, higher-cost dams and WPPSS involvement), or at very high (full : market) rates from the West Coast grid. So true. My claim is that this has happened because City Light, not being guided by short-term profits, managed to put together a reasonable supply system. Puget Power, with stockholders, had a much shorter-term outlook. -- Phil Hughes - FYL - 8315 Lk City Wy NE - Suite 207 - Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: 206-526-2919 x74 Fax: 526-0803 E-mail: fyl@fylz.com or nwnexus!fylz!fyl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan11.233414.25529@fylz.wa.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nwnexus!seanews!fylz!fylReferences:
<1993Jan11.032631.21116@nwnexus.WA.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: pnw.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nwnexus!seanews!fylz!fyl From: fyl@fylz.wa.com (Phil Hughes) Subject: Re: Seattle City Light vs. Puget Power Organization: FYL Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:34:14 GMT Message-ID: <1993Jan11.233414.25529@fylz.wa.com> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6] References: <1993Jan11.032631.21116@nwnexus.WA.COM> Lines: 20