Article View: pnw.general
Article #1124Re: pnw.general != wash.general
From: frankm Frank R. Maloney
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00
50 lines
3235 bytes
3235 bytes
In article <knauer.815794837@ibeam>, knauer@ibeam.jf.intel.com says... > >In <4741gs$eu1@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> ronf@plaza.ds.adp.com (Ron Finley ) writes: >>In article <46ukds$9es@eaglecap.eosc.osshe.edu>, >>Charles Sauls <saulsc@emily.eosc.osshe.edu> wrote: >>> I've always heard it this way: The _Pacific_ Northwest is Oregon, >>>Washington, sometimes B.C., and occasionally Alaska. The _U.S._ Northwest >>>is Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Anything south of 42N >>>(or the southern boundary of Wyoming) is the Southwest, extreme northern >>>California included. >>> Alberta, since it's not on the Pacific, is not a Pacific >>>Northwest province. The Yukon isn't on the Pacific either, and thus is >>>part of the _Canadian_ Northwest, but not the _Pacific_ Northwest. > >... but growing up in Ohio, my history teacher taught us that Ohio, >Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois were acquired as part of the Northwest >Territories ... :-) > My texts always called that the Old Northwest and out here the Pacific Northwest. To include B.C. in the Pacific Northwest is just plain rude, ignoring as it does the rather obvious fact that B.C. is Canada's West Coast. One might say the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia without too much offense, I think. The Pacific Northwest is the U.S. Northwest. And, you can say the P.N.W.and Alaska, too, but Alaska cannot be subsumed into the P.N.W. rubric. BTW, the University of Oregon used to publish, and may still do so, an Economic Atlas of the Pacific Northwest. Their definition was "Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and the 17 western counties of Montana. Or if you approach it ethnographically you might remember that Northwest Indian culture area extended down into northern California, although the salmon-based economy blended into one dominated by acorns; however, many myths and ceremonies were obviously related. Certainly, I feel very much at home in the redwood country. Despite the historic presence of Pacific salmon in the Snake, I have never seen anyone else include Wyoming in the P.N.W. Nor have I have ever encountered a reference that included Alberta. Frank R.A.J. Maloney frankm@microsoft.com -- The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<48iu0f$ef1@news.microsoft.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<44t8d6$7r0@kaleka.seanet.com> <THAkw0O5IcwP084yn@teleport.com> <46s0c2$3jl@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> <46ukds$9es@eaglecap.eosc.osshe.edu> <4741gs$eu1@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> <knauer.815794837@ibeam>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3e2,214a9b01db7a191c X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3e2,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,214a9b01db7a191c X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: 110a87,2c014077fd5e52aa X-Google-Attributes: gid110a87,public X-Google-Thread: 10a18d,214a9b01db7a191c X-Google-Attributes: gid10a18d,public From: frankm (Frank R. Maloney) Subject: Re: pnw.general != wash.general Date: 1995/11/17 Message-ID: <48iu0f$ef1@news.microsoft.com> X-Deja-AN: 119635855 references: <44t8d6$7r0@kaleka.seanet.com> <THAkw0O5IcwP084yn@teleport.com> <46s0c2$3jl@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> <46ukds$9es@eaglecap.eosc.osshe.edu> <4741gs$eu1@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> <knauer.815794837@ibeam> organization: Microsoft Corporation mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: pnw.general,bc.general,or.general,wash.general