🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: pnw.general
Article #645

Re: the debates

#645
From: Bob
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:04
26 lines
1567 bytes
Mark Crispin <mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> writes:
|
| The big winner was Perot.  He was fantastic.  I don't think he's going to be
| able to win the election, but you can't feel guilty about voting for Perot
| after tonight.  Whether the Bush-man or the blow-dried JFK-wannabie win, the
| next four years are going to be nasty.  A Perot voter will have the
| satisfaction of knowing it isn't his fault.

  I agree completely.  Both Bush and Clinton came off as total products
  of the political system.  Both were boring, neither was believable
  and they both continued to snipe at each other.

  Perot, in contrast, was a breath of fresh air.  He stuck to the issues,
  and talked straight, and more importantly, he talked sense.

  I'm going for Perot.  I wasn't happy with his quitting the race,
  but he didn't quit on the POW/MIAs and he didn't let the country
  quit either.  To me, it is the Democrats and the Republicans, and
  not Ross Perot, who have quit on the country.


  Note: Tuesday (4pm): vice-presidential debate
        Thursday(6pm): next presidential debate
  ==

  Bob                                           Seattle, Washington
Technical Details
Message-ID: <DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!gibdo!bobk

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!gibdo!bobk
From: bobk@gibdo.engr.washington.edu (Bob)
Newsgroups: pnw.general
Subject: Re: the debates
Message-ID: <DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 92 22:04:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: gibdo.DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH
Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Washington
Lines: 26