Article View: pnw.general
Article #645Re: the debates
From: Bob
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:04
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:04
26 lines
1567 bytes
1567 bytes
Mark Crispin <mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> writes:
|
| The big winner was Perot. He was fantastic. I don't think he's going to be
| able to win the election, but you can't feel guilty about voting for Perot
| after tonight. Whether the Bush-man or the blow-dried JFK-wannabie win, the
| next four years are going to be nasty. A Perot voter will have the
| satisfaction of knowing it isn't his fault.
I agree completely. Both Bush and Clinton came off as total products
of the political system. Both were boring, neither was believable
and they both continued to snipe at each other.
Perot, in contrast, was a breath of fresh air. He stuck to the issues,
and talked straight, and more importantly, he talked sense.
I'm going for Perot. I wasn't happy with his quitting the race,
but he didn't quit on the POW/MIAs and he didn't let the country
quit either. To me, it is the Democrats and the Republicans, and
not Ross Perot, who have quit on the country.
Note: Tuesday (4pm): vice-presidential debate
Thursday(6pm): next presidential debate
==
Bob Seattle, Washington
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!gibdo!bobkShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!gibdo!bobk From: bobk@gibdo.engr.washington.edu (Bob) Newsgroups: pnw.general Subject: Re: the debates Message-ID: <DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> Date: 12 Oct 92 22:04:06 GMT Article-I.D.: gibdo.DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: University of Washington Lines: 26