Article View: pnw.general
Article #676Re: the debates
From: Scott Blachowicz
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:47
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:47
19 lines
1504 bytes
1504 bytes
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Quigley <mikeq@freddy.CNA.TEK.COM>
Mike> Granted, Perot made the most sense. But, just let him try to impose the subsidy
Mike> reductions, tax increases, and changes to the status quo that he proposes.
I wouldn't necessarily grant that. It seems he's good at identifying problems
but not clear on specific solutions.
Mike> Neither the American power structure nor the American public
Mike> would stand for it. At best he'd be impeached on some trumped-up charge. At
Mike> worst he'd be assinated.
[sic] Just think of Admiral Stockdale as president...
Seems the vice presidential debate provided a rather large reason to avoid
voting for Perot.
--
Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 USPS: Statistical Sciences, Inc
1700 Westlake Ave N #500
scott@statsci.com / uunet!statsci!scott Seattle, WA USA 98109
..or.. Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SCOTT.92Oct14094724@arugula.statsci.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!statsci!scottReferences:
<DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> <3760@master.CNA.TEK.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: pnw.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!statsci!scott From: scott@statsci.com (Scott Blachowicz) Subject: Re: the debates In-Reply-To: mikeq@freddy.CNA.TEK.COM's message of 13 Oct 92 15:31:41 GMT Message-ID: <SCOTT.92Oct14094724@arugula.statsci.com> Sender: usenet@statsci.com (Usenet News Account) Reply-To: scott@statsci.com Organization: Statistical Sciences, Inc., Seattle, WA USA References: <DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> <3760@master.CNA.TEK.COM> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:47:24 GMT Lines: 19