Article View: pnw.general
Article #697Re: the debates
From: David Breneman
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 19:38
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 19:38
55 lines
2838 bytes
2838 bytes
In article <klg.718992140@statsci> klg@statsci.com (Kevin L. Gross) writes: Deletions... > >Does anyone recall the Nixon era when government and big business worked >hand-in-hand to destroy this country's ecology, civil-rights and >individualism? I missed that era. Was this the same Nixon that enacted wage and price controls? Took the dollar off the gold standard? Championed giving 18-year-olds the vote? Underwrote a drug study whose findings were that marijuana should be legalized? No, the Nixon you mention sounds more conservative than that... More deletions... >The next president will be able to choose three Supreme Court Justices. Do >we want a court packed to the hilt by Reabush? And Perot's no better, he >seems to have the compassion of a pit-bull. Now, this is a legitimate argument for voting for Clinton. This country would do pretty well if it had conservative lawmakers and a liberal court. Then the lawmakers would only pass those laws that were absolutely necessary, and the court would knock them all down for impinging on people's rights. The opposite scenario would indeed be dire - a liberal congress passing laws faster than they could be read into the record, and a conservative court upholding everything on the doctrine of "good faith". > Do we really want a country >that doesn't care? I dunno. > Voting for Clinton would at least let the pendulum >swing back the other way and provide the breathing room our country needs >to get out from under the totalitarian regime that is now in power. Who >needs a healthy economy if everyone is in jail? Can you say 1984? Well, neighbor, (another Rogersism) 1984 was about a Socialist dystopia. Much easier to achieve when the Presidency and the Congress are controlled by the same party. Personally, I think the Democrats are just as intent as the Republicans on making just about every human activity compulsory or unlawful. They just part company on which should be which. (Sprinkle all my above commentary lightly with smileys and deposit in /dev/null) -- David Breneman Sys Admin, Tacoma Screw Products, Inc. | ____ ____ ____ dcb@tacoma.uucp | SCREWIE the TSP CLOWN sez- | / /___ /___/ ..!uunet!tacoma!dcb | "Nylok lock nuts lose their | / ____/ / CompuServe: 75760,1232 | binding strength after 1 use!"|
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct15.193829.2087@kopachuk.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nwnexus!seanews!kopachuk!dcbReferences:
<DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> <klg.718992140@statsci>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: pnw.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nwnexus!seanews!kopachuk!dcb From: dcb@kopachuk.uucp (David Breneman) Subject: Re: the debates Message-ID: <1992Oct15.193829.2087@kopachuk.uucp> Organization: Tacoma Screw Products, Inc. References: <DUMP.CLINTON.BUSH@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> <klg.718992140@statsci> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 19:38:29 GMT Lines: 55