Article View: pnw.general
Article #769Re: Tax the rich!
From: Bob Mayo
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:37
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:37
48 lines
2566 bytes
2566 bytes
In article <2381@shaman.wv.tek.com> andrew@frip.wv.tek.com writes: >[] > > "Town Hall had a discussion on SS the other night. One critic > said that the SS ``trust'' fund is completely gone. Empty! > Kaput! Drained!" > >It's a matter of perspective. The surplus of FICA tax income over >entitlement outgo has been invested in Treasury bonds. In other words, >"loaned" to the rest of the federal government. > If the social security fund is to act like a pension fund, lets compare it to a pension fund. Say a company like GM is required to segragate its pension funds, to ensure that the money will be there when their workers retire. Would it be reasonable for GM to issue specially marked bonds that are then bought by their pension fund as an investment? Bonds that can't be bought and sold by anybody except the pension fund and GM? Of course not. This would simply be a transfer of funds out of the pension fund into GM's current operating budget. They'd never get away with it. This is exactly what the US Government is doing today with the social security fund. >But what else would you do? Say you're the fund manager and you're >sitting on 100e9 dollars for ten years. You can't stuff >thousand-dollar bills into your mattress -- you have to invest the >stuff somewhere. Treasury bonds are the "reasonably prudent" >investment of choice here. The US dollar is only worth what the country's economy is worth. It seems to me that $1 invested in private industry will improve the economy more than $1 invested in the government. When I retire in the year 2025, I'd like to be able to say: "because of my social security dollars, US industry is large and profitable" To me that's a lot better than saying: "because of my social security dollars, the US government is large and has lots of programs." I think that the social security tax should be split into two taxes: one to fund current obligations, and another that is saved for future obligations. The latter tax should not go to the government. It should go into an IRA designated by the individual that is taxed. --Bob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1ho6kcINNjih@usenet.pa.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!pa.dec.com!mayoReferences:
<2377@shaman.wv.tek.com> <4104@master.CNA.TEK.COM> <2381@shaman.wv.tek.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!pa.dec.com!mayo From: mayo@pa.dec.com (Bob Mayo) Newsgroups: pnw.general Subject: Re: Tax the rich! Date: 29 Dec 1992 00:37:32 GMT Organization: DEC Western Research Lab Lines: 48 Distribution: pnw Message-ID: <1ho6kcINNjih@usenet.pa.dec.com> References: <2377@shaman.wv.tek.com> <4104@master.CNA.TEK.COM> <2381@shaman.wv.tek.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mayo.pa.dec.com