🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec15.212152.12550@hounix.org> wlarkin@hounix.org (Ward Larkin) writes:
>If a bridge is dangerous, should the government's only
>responsibility be to post a sign which says that the
>bridge is dangerous?  According to you, the government

Here's a thought: If such signs were posted, _and_ a number of
'dangerous' bridges had collapsed, d'ya suppose people might actually
pay some attention to them?  I think they might.  In which case
such a gov't would actually be doing a responsible thing by posting
such a sign.  Of course, some might find the training period a
bit harsh...

-- 
+----------------+
! II      CCCCCC !  Jim Cathey
! II  SSSSCC     !  ISC-Bunker Ramo
! II      CC     !  TAF-C8;  Spokane, WA  99220
! IISSSS  CC     !  UUCP: uunet!isc-br!jimc (jimc@isc-br.isc-br.com)
! II      CCCCCC !  (509) 927-5757
+----------------+
			One Design to rule them all; one Design to find them.
			One Design to bring them all and in the darkness bind
			them.  In the land of Mediocrity where the PC's lie.