Re: More about Wes

Article View: pnw.general

Article #969

#969

From: Eickerman
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 11:08

11 lines
827 bytes

In article <4152@master.CNA.TEK.COM> mikeq@freddy.CNA.TEK.COM writes:
>According to the autopsy report, Dodd died of strangulation (slow) rather than
>by his spine being snapped (quick).
>
>Mike

The news reports also said that Dodd was immediately unconscious by the
neck snapping, so he shouldn't have felt anything during the time for vital
functions to cease operating.

John

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1iir81INNlcg@sumax.seattleu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!sumax.seattleu.edu!sumax.seattleu.edu!not-for-mail

References: <4152@master.CNA.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!sumax.seattleu.edu!sumax.seattleu.edu!not-for-mail
From: daveike@sumax.seattleu.edu (Eickerman)
Newsgroups: pnw.general
Subject: Re: More about Wes
Message-ID: <1iir81INNlcg@sumax.seattleu.edu>
Date: 7 Jan 93 11:08:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: sumax.1iir81INNlcg
References: <4152@master.CNA.TEK.COM>
Organization: Seattle University
Lines: 11
NNTP-Posting-Host: sumax.seattleu.edu

Reply to Parent Message