Thread View: pnw.general
6 messages
6 total messages
Started by Mark Crispin
Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:20
re: Wesley A. Dodd
Author: Mark Crispin
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:20
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:20
18 lines
1616 bytes
1616 bytes
In terms of the necessity of Dodd's death, one only needs to listen to what Dodd himself has said: there is no choice. People such as Wesley Dodd and Ted Bundy can not be salvaged; they can never be made harmless enough to live in our society. We have a ghoulish idea of what constitutes ``mercy''. Hanging kills by fracturing the neck, *not* strangulation, when done properly. Death is instantaneous. Yet, we prefer other means to render the incorrigible harmless. We lock them in a cage to rot for decades, perhaps the rest of their lives, and live in fear of their escape. I don't call being caged ``living'' or ``merciful''. When we do execute them, we prefer the slow means with elaborate procedures. It is absurd that the opponents of the death penalty claim that being strapped on a hospital guerney with a needle pumping salt water into your veins for 15 minutes before they hit with the pentothal is somehow ``merciful'' compared to something that kills in a fraction of a second. Yet this grotesque and lengthy procedure is proferred as ``mercy''!
Re: Wesley A. Dodd
Author: Allen Warren
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:24
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:24
51 lines
3219 bytes
3219 bytes
mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM (Mark Crispin) writes: First of all, let me state that I am still undecided on whether the death penalty is justified. I don't for a moment think that people like Dodd ought to have lived (it's now after the fact), but I don't know if legal killing is really legal. In other words, how can we put truly, legally state it's okay to put a convicted killer to death? An eye for an eye? Something to ponder . . . >In terms of the necessity of Dodd's death, one only needs to listen to what >Dodd himself has said: there is no choice. People such as Wesley Dodd and Ted >Bundy can not be salvaged; they can never be made harmless enough to live in >our society. >We have a ghoulish idea of what constitutes ``mercy''. Hanging kills by >fracturing the neck, *not* strangulation, when done properly. Death is >instantaneous. Yet, we prefer other means to render the incorrigible >harmless. We lock them in a cage to rot for decades, perhaps the rest of >their lives, and live in fear of their escape. I don't call being caged >``living'' or ``merciful''. No death row inmates, have, according to a report on NPR this morning, escaped from prisons in Oregon or Washington (where Dodd was hanged earlier today). In one respect, and hypothesizing that Dodd had killed my two little boys, I'm not sure if hanging, to me, would justify a proper punishment for Dodd. For me, knowing Dodd was rotting in prison for the rest of his life *might* make me feel more like he was receiving proper punishment, but in looking at his execution, I see that one more child molester/murderer is NOT in society and one more prisoner is NOT soaking up money in upkeep. Also, no matter what could have happened to Dodd, it still wouldn't bring back those he murdered. >When we do execute them, we prefer the slow means with elaborate procedures. >It is absurd that the opponents of the death penalty claim that being strapped >on a hospital guerney with a needle pumping salt water into your veins for 15 >minutes before they hit with the pentothal is somehow ``merciful'' compared to >something that kills in a fraction of a second. Yet this grotesque and >lengthy procedure is proferred as ``mercy''! According to news reports, the trap door underneath Dodd was opened at 12:05 AM, his body dropped down, there was a slight jerk in the rope, his body turned slightly to the side, and doctors examined him at 12:09 AM, proclaiming him dead at that time. A news reporter who witnessed the hanging reported that initially, prior to viewing the hanging, he expected the hanging to be a gruesome event. After the hanging, in retrospect, he and other viewers noted how *peaceful* it really seemed, and the reporter stated that, "If I were going to be executed, that's the way I'd want to go." allen
Re: Wesley A. Dodd
Author: David Barts
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:47
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:47
18 lines
1296 bytes
1296 bytes
Just two observations:
1. There's plenty more individuals like Dodd in our society; conditions
are creating more each day. Expect more of the same, because treating
symptoms never cures the disease.
2. Conservatives, who have great trouble in trusting government to tax
and distribute income (subject to the appropriate bureaucratic
procedures), seem to have no trouble in trusting the government when it
kills people (subject to the appropriate bureaucratic procedures).
Curious. Perhaps the Tooth Fairy comes and sprinkles magic Efficiency
Dust (R) over the Corrections Department in her off hours. Or maybe its
the Easter Bunny who does that.
--
David Barts N5JRN UW Civil Engineering, FX-10
davidb@ce.washington.edu Seattle, WA 98195
Re: Wesley A. Dodd
Author: David Barts
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:06
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:06
13 lines
1135 bytes
1135 bytes
dxxb@hardy.u.washington.edu (David Barts) writes: > Curious. Perhaps the Tooth Fairy comes and sprinkles magic Efficiency > Dust (R) over the Corrections Department in her off hours. Or maybe its > the Easter Bunny who does that. Okay, I'll admit it - this was flame bait. But you get my point - I simply can't trust the government (or anyone else that matter) completely enough to give it that kind of life or death power. -- David Barts N5JRN UW Civil Engineering, FX-10 davidb@ce.washington.edu Seattle, WA 98195
Re: Wesley A. Dodd
Author: Bohdan Tashchuk
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 21:50
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 21:50
30 lines
2016 bytes
2016 bytes
In <1icf6gINNrve@shelley.u.washington.edu> dxxb@hardy.u.washington.edu (David Barts) writes: >> Curious. Perhaps the Tooth Fairy comes and sprinkles magic Efficiency >> Dust (R) over the Corrections Department in her off hours. Or maybe its >> the Easter Bunny who does that. >Okay, I'll admit it - this was flame bait. But you get my point >- I simply can't trust the government (or anyone else that matter) >completely enough to give it that kind of life or death power. You and I have a basic philosophical difference of opinion here. I look at goverment and see that guys like Charles Manson and Sirhan Sirhan have parole hearings on a regular basis. I see guys like Hinckley get smart lawyers and weasel their way out of very serious charges. In fact a while ago one of the first two came close to going free until there was a large public protest (it's been years so my recollection is hazy). Even when people are put behind bars "without possibility of parole", there are always people like Mike Dukakis who think they should get weekends off for a little R & R. I simply can't trust the government to keep these people locked up. The death penalty solves the problem. And since it is applied in this country to only the most heinous of crimes, I'm not very worried about it being misapplied. For example, Dodd is the first person executed in Washington in 29.5 years. And Washington isn't likely to do more than a few a year even if they can figure out how to get past the ACLU and the liberal appeals courts. So there. Counter flame bait.
Re: Wesley A. Dodd
Author: David Barts
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 00:24
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 00:24
26 lines
1781 bytes
1781 bytes
zeke@fasttech.com (Bohdan Tashchuk) writes: >>Okay, I'll admit it - this was flame bait. But you get my point >>- I simply can't trust the government (or anyone else that matter) >>completely enough to give it that kind of life or death power. >You and I have a basic philosophical difference of opinion here. > [edited] >I simply can't trust the government to keep these people locked up. The death >penalty solves the problem. And since it is applied in this country to only the >most heinous of crimes, I'm not very worried about it being misapplied. For >example, Dodd is the first person executed in Washington in 29.5 years. And >Washington isn't likely to do more than a few a year even if they can figure >out how to get past the ACLU and the liberal appeals courts. So the Magic Efficency Dust is scattered more selectively than I thought. The Tooth Fairy apparently sprinkles liberal doses all over the execution chamber while skipping over the Parole Board's meeting room. Oh. -- David Barts N5JRN UW Civil Engineering, FX-10 davidb@ce.washington.edu Seattle, WA 98195
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads