🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <336787AC.7472@primenet.com>,
Charlie McCann  <chasmc@primenet.com> wrote:
>James J. Lippard wrote:
> 
>> Please document one lie from Primenet anywhere in this exchange, or
>> retract and apologize.  
>
>Here is a singularly odious untruth from the president of Primenet :
>
>On 27 April  Nathan Raciborski said :
>
>"For the last few weeks even prior to this issue, you have been spewing
>ignorance in primenet.general; and I have already posted my observations
>on those." 
>
>Now Jim, surely you have access to the posts made by myself in the few
>weeks preceding 27 April 97.  I invite you to prove this spurious,
>unwarranted and unfortunately typical view of reality from the president
>of primenet.

I don't know what Nathan was referring to, and he may even have
mistakenly confused you with another poster.  A quick look at DejaNews
doesn't show any likely candidates in primenet.general (but it only
shows what is crossposted to external newsgroups).

I see now that you refer to it as an "untruth" rather than a "lie"--I
am sure you know there is a difference.  If someone continues repeating
something false after being corrected, then that is pretty clearly
lying.  If someone simply says something false, that is not necessarily
any evidence at all that they are lying.

--
Jim Lippard    lippard@(primenet.com ediacara.org skeptic.com)
Phoenix, Arizona  http://www.primenet.com/~lippard/
PGP Fingerprint: 35 65 66 9F 71 FE 50 57  35 09 0F F6 14 D0 C6 04