🚀 go-pugleaf

Brian Trosko wrote:

> That's bullshit.  Primenet hasn't evaded anything.  Nathan came right out
> and told you what they were doing,

And because nathan says it, it's just got to be true ? Aren't you the
guy who said
"You can tell the telemarketer to never call back, and then he's not
allowed to." ? I would have never believed you to be this gullible . 

> and that they contracted another
> company to help out.  There was no, repeat *NO*, evasion or prevarication
> on his part.

Look, since you're so tight with nathan, and *you* are so certain the is
*NO* evasion, can you answer these simple polite questions :

(1) Who is Rita Berkley
(2) Is this her real name
(3) What is the name of the firm she works for
(4) What is the firms address and phone number

> The fact that you portray his response as evasion is pretty clear evidence
> that you're a raving loon.  Go Away.

Evidently you need some help here. It's the *lack* of response that is
evasive. Get it ? I'll bet you do, but for some reason you choose to
make a fool of yourself.


Charlie McCann   
-- 
The fact is that Primenet turns over confidential/personal customer
information from their data base to third parties to be used for
unintended purposes.