🚀 go-pugleaf

Wes Warner wrote:
> 
> In message <329DA4FD.488C@baldhead.com> - John Connolly
> <image@baldhead.com>Thu, 28 Nov 1996 09:43:09 -0500 writes:
> 
> [snip]
> >People of good will have always had the upper hand in Quebec.
> 
> *** I don't think the present PQ government
>     consist of "people of goodwill".
>     At least not as I understand those words.
>     The general public in Quebec are indeed people
>     of good will, but badly represented.
> 
> :>Why 2 prime recipients of transfer payments -- Elijah Harper & Clyde Wells
> :>were allowed to scuttle a low cost initiative to redesign Confederation
> :>only a forensic sociologist could say.
> 
> *** I don't think your words above evidence much "good will"
>     toward two people who acted in good faith, in public,
>     and in accord with the rules.
> 
>     The rules for Meech lake ratification were absurd
>     -- a strong signal as to the quality of the
>     remainder of the thinking in it.
> 
> Rene Levesque put it best when
> :>he reprimanded errant party members with " dissention has run amongst
> :>us like a rat for 300 years."
> 
> *** RL did have his share of "good will".
>     His "us" in the quite above presumably
>     referred to Quebecers or to all Canadians
>     and was not an ethnocentric crack at ROC.
> 
> 
> :>But English Canada can no longer count on this lack of focus. One plan
> :>to deflate the billowing egos of provincial 'leaders' might be to pick
> :>a time to jam their phones, faxes & email servers with an indication
> :>that many Canadians want a resolution to this endless bickering.
> 
> *** The bickering will end only when it
>     causes a clear consistent and gradually
>     increasing penalty.
>     It will never end if rewarded
> 
>     Quebec is doing the bickering and
>     ROC (via fed gov) has been doing the rewarding.
>      (Although there are promising signs that this
>       game is no longer working.)
>     Even still, the Quebec economy is declining
>     since the public represents itself and acts
>     in its own interest, unlike its governments.

Wow.... c'est fantastique vos commentaires mais....
arr�tez vos charrues.... ici c'est le site CAN.FRANCAIS...
regardez bien le dernier mot et devinez le sens...
bien entendu, il y a beaucoup de gens qui n'acceptent pas le fait
qu'il existe des francophones au Cacanada...
c'est une infime partie du fait que l'on veut se s�parer...
faites un effort et essayez de comprendre mon message....
" Si je postais une lettre en fran�ais � un site anglophone....
  que se passerait-il? "
-- 
Michel Ouellet