Article View: qc.general
Article #79Re: Montreal
From: Jonathan Marchi
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:00
38 lines
3322 bytes
3322 bytes
On Thu, 07 Nov 1996 23:39:06 GMT, downing@total.net (T.Downing) wrote: >On Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:58:41 -0700, Neil <neils@imap1.asu.edu> wrote: >English and French speaking Montrealers are actually very similar. Compared >to Torontonians, we are smarter, stronger and better looking. Reallly? I hate to say this (since I'm in it as well) but if we're smarter than Torontonians, you'd think we'd have booming business instead of high unemployment and we wouldn't have (or wouldn't have to) vote for people who are making our lives worse than what they currently are. As for being stronger. How about heavier instead? It seems to be a fact that there are more fat people in Quebec than in most other provinces. I won't say that it's accurate since it's one of those word of mouth informations but that's just to say that I don't see how you can justify that we're stronger than Torontonians to begin with. Going into looks. Are we better looking than them? For the men, wouldn't be able to say if I had them in front of me since I don't care much to look at men in that way so I leave that to those who do. As for women, I've never been to Toronto but have been to other places and have found that Montreal women are better looking. Why? Could be a bunch of reasons. Perhaps it's because I live here and see them all the time and I don't think anyone who likes they're city would go around saying that they have ugly women. It could also be a bunch of other reasons that I could enumerate here but wouldn't want to because the writing envolved could probably fill some 500 page psychiatric book and be wasted. ALP! ----------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Marchi + Fan of Sci-Fi and Anime such as newwave@cedep.com + Urusei Yatsura, Babylon 5 From Montreal, Ca + Nuku Nuku, Slider, Evangelion
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3287dd31.12653070@news.cedep.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.escape.ca> <511beg$8cg@ns.RezoNet.NET> <512hcm$8om@myth.vianet.on.ca> <32374FE1.734E@mlink.net><322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.es <derepeny.844103386@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA> <52rec1$o8c@lyorn.mdd.comm.mot.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.961001105733.9671B-100000@general3.asu.edu> <328c7313.14697533@news.total.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f504b,e5bd2480bb1f8b X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: ff20b,e5bd2480bb1f8b X-Google-Attributes: gidff20b,public X-Google-Thread: 100c8e,bb5e338e8a6a4c70 X-Google-Attributes: gid100c8e,public X-Google-Thread: 114af9,e5bd2480bb1f8b X-Google-Attributes: gid114af9,public X-Google-Thread: 1031e2,e2ccf550990c77fd X-Google-Attributes: gid1031e2,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,2c314f884e9baac7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,e5bd2480bb1f8b X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 108c64,895163d021deaae3 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c64,public From: newwave@cedep.com (Jonathan Marchi) Subject: Re: Montreal Date: 1996/11/12 Message-ID: <3287dd31.12653070@news.cedep.com> X-Deja-AN: 195976405 references: <322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.escape.ca> <511beg$8cg@ns.RezoNet.NET> <512hcm$8om@myth.vianet.on.ca> <32374FE1.734E@mlink.net><322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.es <derepeny.844103386@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA> <52rec1$o8c@lyorn.mdd.comm.mot.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.961001105733.9671B-100000@general3.asu.edu> <328c7313.14697533@news.total.net> organization: SPC newsgroups: qc.general,mtl.general,can.general,can.english,can.politics,niagara.general,tor.general,wpg.general,can.atlantic.general,ott.general,bc.general,soc.culture.quebec