🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: qc.general
Article #79

Re: Montreal

#79
From: Jonathan Marchi
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:00
38 lines
3322 bytes
On Thu, 07 Nov 1996 23:39:06 GMT, downing@total.net (T.Downing) wrote:

>On Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:58:41 -0700, Neil <neils@imap1.asu.edu> wrote:

>English and French speaking Montrealers are actually very similar. Compared
>to Torontonians, we are smarter, stronger and better looking.

Reallly? I hate to say this (since I'm in it as well) but if we're
smarter than Torontonians, you'd think we'd have booming business
instead of high unemployment and we wouldn't have (or wouldn't have
to) vote for people who are making our lives worse than what they
currently are.

As for being stronger. How about heavier instead? It seems to be a
fact that there are more fat people in Quebec than in most other
provinces. I won't say that it's accurate since it's one of those word
of mouth informations but that's just to say that I don't see how you
can justify that we're stronger than Torontonians to begin with.

Going into looks. Are we better looking than them? For the men,
wouldn't be able to say if I had them in front of me since I don't
care much to look at men in that way so I leave that to those who do.
As for women, I've never been to Toronto but have been to other places
and have found that Montreal women are better looking. Why? Could be a
bunch of reasons. Perhaps it's because I live here and see them all
the time and I don't think anyone who likes they're city would go
around saying that they have ugly women. It could also be a bunch of
other reasons that I could enumerate here but wouldn't want to because
the writing envolved could probably fill some 500 page psychiatric
book and be wasted. 

ALP!

-----------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Marchi    + Fan of Sci-Fi and Anime such as
newwave@cedep.com  +    Urusei Yatsura, Babylon 5
From Montreal, Ca  +  Nuku Nuku, Slider, Evangelion
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3287dd31.12653070@news.cedep.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.escape.ca> <511beg$8cg@ns.RezoNet.NET> <512hcm$8om@myth.vianet.on.ca> <32374FE1.734E@mlink.net><322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.es <derepeny.844103386@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA> <52rec1$o8c@lyorn.mdd.comm.mot.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.961001105733.9671B-100000@general3.asu.edu> <328c7313.14697533@news.total.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f504b,e5bd2480bb1f8b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public
X-Google-Thread: ff20b,e5bd2480bb1f8b
X-Google-Attributes: gidff20b,public
X-Google-Thread: 100c8e,bb5e338e8a6a4c70
X-Google-Attributes: gid100c8e,public
X-Google-Thread: 114af9,e5bd2480bb1f8b
X-Google-Attributes: gid114af9,public
X-Google-Thread: 1031e2,e2ccf550990c77fd
X-Google-Attributes: gid1031e2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10643c,2c314f884e9baac7
X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public
X-Google-Thread: fb374,e5bd2480bb1f8b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c64,895163d021deaae3
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c64,public
From: newwave@cedep.com (Jonathan Marchi)
Subject: Re: Montreal
Date: 1996/11/12
Message-ID: <3287dd31.12653070@news.cedep.com>
X-Deja-AN: 195976405
references: <322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.escape.ca> <511beg$8cg@ns.RezoNet.NET> <512hcm$8om@myth.vianet.on.ca> <32374FE1.734E@mlink.net><322C2046.6072@odyssee.net> <50i67g$qkr@nntp.igs.net> <50n2t8$pdr@wpg-01.es <derepeny.844103386@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA> <52rec1$o8c@lyorn.mdd.comm.mot.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.961001105733.9671B-100000@general3.asu.edu> <328c7313.14697533@news.total.net>
organization: SPC
newsgroups: qc.general,mtl.general,can.general,can.english,can.politics,niagara.general,tor.general,wpg.general,can.atlantic.general,ott.general,bc.general,soc.culture.quebec