🚀 go-pugleaf

Jean Coyle wrote:

> Alan Davis wrote:
> > Jean Coyle wrote:
> > > Marg Petersen wrote:
> > > > >In <34434198.83F2C373@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> Alan Davis
> > > > ><adavis@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> writes:
> > > > >>Carol Ann Hemingway wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>             So fine;  I'll submit to _god_; the man can
> > > > >>>             submit to me...his wife.
> > > > >>>             -----------------
> > > > >>
> > > > >>You really do have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?
> > > > >
> > > > Interesting how the role reversal (husband submitting to wife
> > > > and wife submitting to god), is NOT acceptable but the reverse
> > > > is?  Hmmmmm, things that make one pause.
> >
> > > good point Marg ! look out the word that rhymes with rich that women
> > > get called a lot here when they've made a point will probably start
> > > flying next.
> >
> > > Jean
> >
> > Not really a good point, because she
> > disagreed with something I never said.
> >
> > Don't be frightened, Jean, not everyone is as evil as you
> > believe.
> >
> she made a very valid point Alan. If what PK is advocating is so
> great, what woukd be wrong with reversing it.. Women submit
> to God, men submit to their wives ?
>
> Jean

 Not really, because PK advocates nothing of the sort.

Ephesians 5:20-21 says husbands and wives ought to
submit to *each other*.  What does this mean, other than
give in from time to time?  Lefty's false paradigm, which Marge
echoed and you agreed with, is not the PK advocacy.

--
Al Davis ***** A Displaced Cub Fan in DC ***** adavis@seas.gwu.edu
I like two teams:  The Cubs and whoever is playing the Mets
Vote Santo into the Hall of Fame!
Let's play two!