Article View: rci.general
Article #13Re: FCC is considering petition to ban Internet Phone
From: Josh Landess
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00
47 lines
3086 bytes
3086 bytes
On 15 Apr 1996 03:03:35 GMT, Tommy the Terrorist <u58563@uic.edu> wrote: >In article <3171758c.1541757@news.enteract.com> Josh Landess, >jlandess@starnetinc.com writes: >>The net, like anything else, has inherent limitations. There is only >>a certain amount of data that its can handle in its present form. > If "market forces" were set to drive Internet prices up, the long >distance companies wouldn't be demanding this censorship of their rivals, >now would they? The simple fact is that when you pay for a dialup >account with an Internet Provider, you pay for all the access you can >cram down a 28.8k modem line. Whether it's those silly pictures on the >Netscape Home Page, or a telephone conversation, that amount of bandwidth >is used up for most of the time you're on-line. Notice that the I-phone >connection goes via that modem; hence, it uses substantially less >bandwidth than an ISDN line, which is what effectively is used up by one >standard telephone conversation. You use 28.8k with I-phone, versus 64k >for the standard. What the phone companies want banned, therefore, is >the Internet Provider's ability to offer people a wider range of options >as to how much voice quality they are willing to sacrifice in order to >get a cheaper connection! I was not aware of the differences in bandwidth, but was simply looking at supply and demand. If I am able to speak long distance using my isp on a regular basis and others increasingly do this, then I suspect the price will go up. Even if supply is increased I do not at present see how it can keep pace with demand. > This is absolutely contrary to the spirit of >the "Free Market" propaganda we hear spouted from every politician's >lips, but of course, wholly in the spirit of what they actually intend. > Note also that the Free Market does not force people to get a good >deal. If people like you are willing to meekly acquiesce to rate >increases and service cuts, I do not want to pay higher prices but am trying to remain cognizant of the forces at work. >this will DEFINE the new demand curve, and >cause those increases and cuts. Whereas those who shop around for the >best deal benefit not only themselves, but all other consumers as well, >by rewarding good companies for good service. Josh This Message was voice-dictated.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3172708e.4477732@news.enteract.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Dp7Hu7.1rr@rci.ripco.com> <4krc8n$2i9@nntp.interaccess.com> <3171758c.1541757@news.enteract.com> <4ksea7$1o9o@piglet.cc.uic.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e835,7bd6e2d3465c003b X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: 10d5fa,7bd6e2d3465c003b X-Google-Attributes: gid10d5fa,public X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,7bd6e2d3465c003b X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public From: jlandess@starnetinc.com (Josh Landess) Subject: Re: FCC is considering petition to ban Internet Phone Date: 1996/04/15 Message-ID: <3172708e.4477732@news.enteract.com> X-Deja-AN: 147611900 references: <Dp7Hu7.1rr@rci.ripco.com> <4krc8n$2i9@nntp.interaccess.com> <3171758c.1541757@news.enteract.com> <4ksea7$1o9o@piglet.cc.uic.edu> organization: EnterAct, L.L.C. newsgroups: rci.general,chi.general,chi.internet