Article View: rci.general
Article #198Re: NOW challenge to PK
From: -Davis,R.H.
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
42 lines
3179 bytes
3179 bytes
In article <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com>, Daniel B. Holzman <holzman@xochi.tezcat.com> wrote: >In article <61g9uq$9hk$1@Mars.mcs.net>, Karl Denninger <karl@MCS.COM> wrote: >>> >>>005:023 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the >>>head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. >>>005:024 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives >>>be to their own husbands in every thing. >>>005:025 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, >>>and gave himself for it; >> >>A husband is called to submit himself to his wife. This obligation is >>specifically stated to persist even *to the point of his own death* in >>this regard. > >The word "submit" does not occur in the passage you quote. > the more i see of this thread the more convinced i am that it is somewhat hopeless to debate with karl denninger. i also wondered where he was getting the word "submit" (i.e. the husband is to...) out of the passage that you cited. yet, based upon his later comments it seems that the gospel is unambigous, and "clear" - which is the problem with religious use of the bible: everyone claims that it is clear but so many people seem to interpret it different ways. i think that the bible, if used properly is a very good book as it says a lot about the human experience. the problem, as i see it, is that so many "religious" people get hung up on what they see to be the "clear" literal interpretation that they lose track of what the stories are really trying to say. for instance, the "walk on water" story is really saying that if you would only believe in yourself you would surprise yourself with what you can do. but many get so hung up on whether you do, or do not believe that two guys *actually* walked on water, that the point gets missed. such is the case when you try to get too literal with the bible... -- __ ______ __ / __/ | lucent technologies, naperville il, usa _/ (_(_) / (_(_/_/_(_/ . ronald.h.davis@lucent.com "in every loss is the opportunity for future gain."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61g8vn$4jr@xochi.tezcat.com> <61g9uq$9hk$1@Mars.mcs.net> <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115ded,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ded,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: fe6e4,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6e4,public X-Google-Thread: f5de8,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5de8,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public From: ronaldd@ihgp3.ih.lucent.com (-Davis,R.H.) Subject: Re: NOW challenge to PK Date: 1997/10/08 Message-ID: <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> X-Deja-AN: 278767939 Distribution: usa References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61g8vn$4jr@xochi.tezcat.com> <61g9uq$9hk$1@Mars.mcs.net> <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com> Organization: Lucent Technologies Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism