Article View: rci.general
Article #202Re: NOW challenge to PK
From: -Davis,R.H.
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
65 lines
3525 bytes
3525 bytes
In article <61goa7$i6h$1@Mars.mcs.net>, Karl Denninger <karl@MCS.COM> wrote: >In article <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com>, >-Davis,R.H. <ronaldd@ihgp3.ih.lucent.com> wrote: > >> yet, based upon his later comments >>it seems that the gospel is unambigous, and "clear" - which is the >>problem with religious use of the bible: everyone claims that it is >>clear but so many people seem to interpret it different ways. > >I've not said that. > let me jog your memory... =============== begin inserted article ========================== Article from chi.media: From: karl@MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism Subject: Re: NOW challenge to PK Date: 8 Oct 1997 10:47:38 -0500 In article <61g8vn$4jr@xochi.tezcat.com>, Daniel B. Holzman <holzman@xochi.tezcat.com> wrote: > [stuff deleted from original post] >005:023 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the >head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. >005:024 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives >be to their own husbands in every thing. >005:025 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, >and gave himself for it; *** begin rhd comment *** in an absolutely fantastic leap of logic you take the above citation and read into it the following interpretation: *** end rhd comment *** A husband is called to submit himself to his wife. [stuff deleted from original post] Thank you for quoting the *WHOLE* passage Dan; you and I appear to disagree about what it says, even though I believe the passage is self-evident and written in clear language. =============== end inserted article ============================ >>such is the case when you try to get too literal with the bible... > >This is not about being literal with the Bible. > well you certainly could have fooled me given how much as you've been citing the bible and talking about how "clear" *THE MESSAGE* is. the only thing that is "clear" is that once you've made up your mind on a matter, there's nothing anyone can say to change it...thus my comment that it seems to be hopelesss to debate with you. -- __ ______ __ / __/ | lucent technologies, naperville il, usa _/ (_(_) / (_(_/_/_(_/ . ronald.h.davis@lucent.com "in every loss is the opportunity for future gain."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<61gqr0$nl5@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com> <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> <61goa7$i6h$1@Mars.mcs.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5de8,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5de8,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: fe6e4,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6e4,public X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: 115ded,c2790f16bb9117a8 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ded,public From: ronaldd@ihgp3.ih.lucent.com (-Davis,R.H.) Subject: Re: NOW challenge to PK Date: 1997/10/08 Message-ID: <61gqr0$nl5@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> X-Deja-AN: 278797929 References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com> <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> <61goa7$i6h$1@Mars.mcs.net> Distribution: usa Organization: Lucent Technologies Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism