🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rci.general
Article #202

Re: NOW challenge to PK

#202
From: -Davis,R.H.
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:00
65 lines
3525 bytes
In article <61goa7$i6h$1@Mars.mcs.net>, Karl Denninger <karl@MCS.COM> wrote:
>In article <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com>,
>-Davis,R.H. <ronaldd@ihgp3.ih.lucent.com> wrote:
>
>> yet, based upon his later comments
>>it seems that the gospel is unambigous, and "clear" - which is the
>>problem with religious use of the bible: everyone claims that it is
>>clear but so many people seem to interpret it different ways.
>
>I've not said that.
>

let me jog your memory...

=============== begin inserted article ==========================
Article from chi.media:
From: karl@MCS.COM (Karl Denninger)
Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism
Subject: Re: NOW challenge to PK
Date: 8 Oct 1997 10:47:38 -0500

In article <61g8vn$4jr@xochi.tezcat.com>,
Daniel B. Holzman <holzman@xochi.tezcat.com> wrote:
>
		[stuff deleted from original post]

>005:023 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the
>head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. 
>005:024 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives
>be to their own husbands in every thing. 
>005:025 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church,
>and gave himself for it; 

*** begin rhd comment ***
in an absolutely fantastic leap of logic you take the above citation
and read into it the following interpretation:
*** end rhd comment ***

A husband is called to submit himself to his wife.

		[stuff deleted from original post]

Thank you for quoting the *WHOLE* passage Dan; you and I appear to disagree
about what it says, even though I believe the passage is self-evident and
written in clear language. 

=============== end inserted article ============================


>>such is the case when you try to get too literal with the bible...
>
>This is not about being literal with the Bible.
>

well you certainly could have fooled me given how much as you've been
citing the bible and talking about how "clear" *THE MESSAGE* is.  the
only thing that is "clear" is that once you've made up your mind on a
matter, there's nothing anyone can say to change it...thus my comment
that it seems to be hopelesss to debate with you.

-- 
  __  ______  __  / __/ |       lucent technologies, naperville il, usa
_/ (_(_) / (_(_/_/_(_/  .       ronald.h.davis@lucent.com
"in every loss is the opportunity for future gain."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <61gqr0$nl5@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com> <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> <61goa7$i6h$1@Mars.mcs.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5de8,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5de8,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e835,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public
X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public
X-Google-Thread: fe6e4,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe6e4,public
X-Google-Thread: 15f5e3,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gid15f5e3,public
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public
X-Google-Thread: 115ded,c2790f16bb9117a8
X-Google-Attributes: gid115ded,public
From: ronaldd@ihgp3.ih.lucent.com (-Davis,R.H.)
Subject: Re: NOW challenge to PK
Date: 1997/10/08
Message-ID: <61gqr0$nl5@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com>
X-Deja-AN: 278797929
References: <61dror$2f2$6@gail.ripco.com> <61ghda$9n6@xochi.tezcat.com> <61gkhq$mkv@ssbunews.ih.lucent.com> <61goa7$i6h$1@Mars.mcs.net>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lucent Technologies
Newsgroups: rci.general,chi.media,chi.general,alt.feminism,soc.women,soc.men,alt.politics.liberalism