🚀 go-pugleaf

In <34457DB2.31E3C519@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> Alan Davis
<adavis@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> writes: 
>
>
>
>Jean Coyle wrote:
>
>> Alan Davis wrote:
>> > Jean Coyle wrote:
>> > > Marg Petersen wrote:
>> > > > >In <34434198.83F2C373@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> Alan Davis
>> > > > ><adavis@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> writes:
>> > > > >>Carol Ann Hemingway wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>>             So fine;  I'll submit to _god_; the man can
>> > > > >>>             submit to me...his wife.
>> > > > >>>             -----------------
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>You really do have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?
>> > > > >
>> > > > Interesting how the role reversal (husband submitting to wife
>> > > > and wife submitting to god), is NOT acceptable but the reverse
>> > > > is?  Hmmmmm, things that make one pause.
>> >
>> > > good point Marg ! look out the word that rhymes with rich that
women
>> > > get called a lot here when they've made a point will probably
start
>> > > flying next.
>> >
>> > > Jean
>> >
>> > Not really a good point, because she
>> > disagreed with something I never said.
>> >
>> > Don't be frightened, Jean, not everyone is as evil as you
>> > believe.
>> >
>> she made a very valid point Alan. If what PK is advocating is so
>> great, what woukd be wrong with reversing it.. Women submit
>> to God, men submit to their wives ?
>>
>> Jean
>
> Not really, because PK advocates nothing of the sort.
>
>Ephesians 5:20-21 says husbands and wives ought to
>submit to *each other*.  What does this mean, other than
>give in from time to time?  Lefty's false paradigm, which Marge
>echoed and you agreed with, is not the PK advocacy.


            ----------
            You still haven't refuted the PK policy that men 
            submit to GOD, and wives submit to husbands.  
    
                Lefty