🚀 go-pugleaf

In <34457E13.8F059111@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> Alan Davis
<adavis@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> writes: 
>
>
>
>Carol Ann Hemingway wrote:
>
>> In <34444E16.916DAEBC@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> Alan Davis
>> <adavis@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> writes:
>> >Marg Petersen wrote:
>> >> >In <34434198.83F2C373@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> Alan Davis
>> >> ><adavis@seas.gwu.edu.NOSPAM> writes:
>> >> >>Carol Ann Hemingway wrote:
>
>
>
>> >> >>>             So fine;  I'll submit to _god_; the man can
>> >> >>>             submit to me...his wife.
>> >> >>>             -----------------
>> >> >>You really do have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?
>
>
>
>> >> Interesting how the role reversal (husband submitting to wife
>> >> and wife submitting to god), is NOT acceptable but the reverse
>> >> is?  Hmmmmm, things that make one pause.
>
>
>
>> >I said both the reverse and the original were wrong.
>
>
>
>> >Next time, pause before posting.
>> >Ephesians 5:20-21 says submit to
>> >each other.  This means love and provide
>> >charitable acts for each other.  Lefty's
>> >paradigm is wrong, she's been refuted
>> >no end, yet continues her blather.  Her role
>> >reversal is wrong, and your application of
>> >her role reversal logic to all men is also wrong.
>
>
>
>>             ---------
>>             So, it isn't true then that PK expects men to
>>             submit to god....while wives submit to men?
>>
>>                 Lefty
>> >
>
> You are correct, it isn't true.  I recommend Ephesians 5:20-21.

            ----------
            I can't find my bible;  it's either boxed up in
            my garage, or given away with my other illusions
            of childhood.  The Muslim religion also doesn't
            preach veils, but that doesn't stop them from putting
            their women in them.  In the same sense, the goals
            of PK is to have women submit to their husbands.

                    Lefty