🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio.misc
Article #22

Re: Best Recordable Port'MD Player?

#22
From: Johan Haspeslagh
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00
35 lines
2663 bytes
Giles wrote:

 ....
> They might be buying up MDs fast in Japan but sales are stagnant or
> falling elsewhere .  I have seen posts from people in the US who want
> to know where they can obtain blank disks because stores are not
> stocking them anymore due to low sales of the players and disks.

 ....
> Why is MD better for home listening?  The format uses  compression
> that discards a large part of the original information that one
> supposedly can't hear.  Using Low-Fi headphones or speakers maybe but
> using good headphones I certainly can hear the difference.  The sound
> quality of MD is inferior to that of DAT.

...
 
How did you do your test ? What are the differences you perceived ?
I did tests on a DCC (which uses the highest quality MPEG I compression)
and I could never be sure that there was really a difference. If there
is a difference it is really minor. 

> I will grant you that DAT is theoretically prone to tape/head wear but
> it has not been noticeable to me as yet.  I think I would grow tired
> of the music before a tape had audible wear.  I saw a post by someone
> who played the same DAT tape every night to go to sleep to and had
> played it several thousand times with no audible degradation in sound
> quality.  If this is typical I don't think tape wear is a real issue.

Are there any hard numbers on tape-wear somewhere ?

 
greetings
Johan
Technical Details
Message-ID: <32DCE9E8.167EB0E7@rc.bel.alcatel.be>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970110151227.22197G-100000@godiva> <32d8399a.2908168@news.uwa.edu.au> <32d8866d.86394698@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <32dadd06.6281113@news.uwa.edu.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f749a,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gidf749a,public
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: 147b40,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid147b40,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c0a,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 10238b,4a56868ab364f8db
X-Google-Attributes: gid10238b,public
From: Johan Haspeslagh <haspeslj@rc.bel.alcatel.be>
Subject: Re: Best Recordable Port'MD Player?
Date: 1997/01/15
Message-ID: <32DCE9E8.167EB0E7@rc.bel.alcatel.be>
X-Deja-AN: 209974832
references: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970110151227.22197G-100000@godiva> <32d8399a.2908168@news.uwa.edu.au> <32d8866d.86394698@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <32dadd06.6281113@news.uwa.edu.au>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Alcatel Telecom Research Division
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.opinion,no.audio,fj.rec.av,aus.hi-fi,red.audio.hight-end,rec.audio.tech
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)