Article View: rec.audio.pro
Article #1577Re: choose: a single vocal mike ?
From: roughplanet
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:26
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:26
66 lines
4188 bytes
4188 bytes
"Soundhaspriority" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:C5E51124.4EB30%nowhere@nowhere.com... On 3/16/09 3:48 PM, in article 57160e02-faf2-4627-9622-2677d1f727ff@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, "Rob B" <arby@insightbb.com> wrote: On Mar 15, 10:22 pm, Soundhaspriority <nowh...@nowhere.com> wrote: "Mike Rivers" <mriv...@d-and-d.com> wrote in message news:BmYul.191$6%.99@nwrddc01.gnilink.net... Sebastian Zuendorf wrote: >>>>> I see your point, but as Bob stated, he will be using it close. And >>>>> even then a SM58 will be out-performed by nearly any other vocal mic >>>>> in that pricerange (and of course above it). >>>> "Close" for a vocal mic is 1/4" to 2". He later said it would be about >>>> a foot >>>> away, and i agree that an SM-58 is quite inappropriate for that. >>>>> I know 2 or 3 singers that it works for. If I use that mic, I have to >>>>> add a lot of high-end to get half decent sound from it and even then >>>>> it sounds harsh and lacks clarity above 2kHz. >>>> To me that doesn't sound like it works well at all. I know very few >>>> singers for which it doesn't work as a performing mic, and that's what >>>> it's >>>> meant for. >>>> When capturing a live performance to a recording, the performance is a >>>> very important part. If the singer doesn't feel like he or she is >>>> performing, while the high end may be stellar, the music will be blah. >>>> >>>> Now if it's a recording session and Bob doesn't want the singer to work >>>> the mic like he's performing, that's a different story. The question >>>> then >>>> is: "What's a safe microphone for random, unknown singers in front of >>>> a band, >>>> given that I don't want the singer to swallow the mic?" For something >>>> that's >>>> easy to buy these days (that is, not a vintage mic that may have to be >>>> reworked before it's usable), I'd suggest either an AKG C414 or an AEA >>>> R84. >>>> And of course a good preamp to go with the chosen mic. >>> Mike, thanks, we're on the same page. I wouldn't want to be carrying >>> around >>> an R84. Besides, daddy told me that I can't buy any more sound equipment >>> until I get a job. And the chances of that are pretty fucking nil. But >>> I'll >>> look at the C414, because I like to dream. It may be very similar >>> looking >>> to something I already have, and as everyone knows with mics, "look" is >>> everything. >>> >>> Bwian McCarty >> boring asshole > Would you, please? I like that. . . We know that already you sad bugger. A pity someone wouldn't do it with a firehose. ruff
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<49beeb97$0$32007$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<p4GdnfrX8aAqkiHUnZ2dnUVZ_hGWnZ2d@giganews.com> <xHUul.146$6%.111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <sn6or4peudvmvgcfepfn0uvtb3vcp7028r@4ax.com> <UJVul.164$6%.36@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <j6cor45l1hqp9moemlqsu8kmfnutte4rbi@4ax.com> <BmYul.191$6%.99@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <1eudnUW4sfZlySHUnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@giganews.com> <C5E4110D.4EA3A%nowhere@nowhere.com> <57160e02-faf2-4627-9622-2677d1f727ff@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <C5E51124.4EB30%nowhere@nowhere.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,808064c480a32bb0 X-Google-Thread: 104a1f,a59c26d12314b420 X-Google-Thread: 101ff3,a59c26d12314b420 X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,a59c26d12314b420 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,gid104a1f,gid101ff3,gid108c0a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail From: "roughplanet" <roughplanet@optusnet.com.au> Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,aus.hi-fi References: <p4GdnfrX8aAqkiHUnZ2dnUVZ_hGWnZ2d@giganews.com> <xHUul.146$6%.111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <sn6or4peudvmvgcfepfn0uvtb3vcp7028r@4ax.com> <UJVul.164$6%.36@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <j6cor45l1hqp9moemlqsu8kmfnutte4rbi@4ax.com> <BmYul.191$6%.99@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <1eudnUW4sfZlySHUnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@giganews.com> <C5E4110D.4EA3A%nowhere@nowhere.com> <57160e02-faf2-4627-9622-2677d1f727ff@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <C5E51124.4EB30%nowhere@nowhere.com> Subject: Re: choose: a single vocal mike ? Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:26:28 +1100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Lines: 68 Message-ID: <49beeb97$0$32007$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.108.6.132 X-Trace: 1237248919 32007 122.108.6.132 X-Original-Bytes: 3806