Article View: rec.audio.pro
Article #1616Re: Robert Morein and the telescope incident he denied.
From: Rob B
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:18
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:18
62 lines
4118 bytes
4118 bytes
On Jan 30, 4:04 am, Soundhaspriority <nowh...@nowhere.com> wrote: > A while back I was teasing Morein about getting some measurements wrong with > respect to a telescope. Actually the Hubble telescope. He denied that he > ever had done so or that he had ever had such a conversation on another > newsgroup. It was part of one his bullshit rants where he was claiming that > there is some meaning in the fact that sighted listening produces results > that are at variance with blind listening. Naturally, he was ripped to > shreds by the actual experts on rec.audio.pro. > > You may discover more of what a boob he is by going here-- > > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.tech/browse_thread/thread/a0... > cb1c654/ce02f0bf81e971cd?lnk=st&q=robert+morein+(telescope > )+group:rec.audio.tech&rnum=1&hl=en#ce02f0bf81e971cd > > Note that he tries to tell Dick Pierce that Mr. Pierce is wrong. BOB said: > "Dick, I didn't realize you're a member of the bull**** club as well. The > telescope mirror is 40 inches in diameter, and the Focault knife-edge test > would have easily detected the abberration in the assembled system." > > Dick Said: "Kind readers, witness Mr. Morein describing ME as a member of > the "bull**** club," when he a) quotes the mirror size quite incorrectly > (it's a 2.4 meter Ritchey-Chretien all-mirror system, that's 94 inches) AND > while he might be have passing familiarity with the term Focault test, he is > clearly unfamiliar with the fact that Focault knife-edge testing was NOT > used for figure verification" > > If Morein can think that 40" is the same as 2.4 meters, then why can't 4 > microns be the same as 50 microns? That's the GOOD science that Morein > practices. > > Of course, Moreain can't even describe the simplest of physical optics > correctly, for example: > > [a] 100 watt lightbulb in a tin can, with a pinhole creating an > approximation of a parallel beam > > A pinhole CANNOT, under ANY circumstances, create ANY approximation of a > parallel beam unless it is placed approximately an infinite distance away. > This sort of completely fundamental error doesn't do a lot to lend any > crdibility of his shrill cries about someone else's "bad" science. > > His "science" has 40 inches equaling 95 inches (2.4 meters), 4 microns > equaling 50 microns, and pinhole light sources emitting parallel rays." > > http://robertmorein.blogspot.com/ > > "I don't really have a replacement career, it's a very gnawing thing." > > Robert Morein > Dresher, PA > (310) 237-6511 > (215) 646-4894 grow up - boring asshole
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77c3f1b6-5fde-4c2e-98a9-b102fc6e2f90@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<C5A83AC6.BCC46%nowhere@nowhere.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,14fbb34873d7982 X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,14fbb34873d7982 X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,14fbb34873d7982 X-Google-Thread: 104a1f,14fbb34873d7982 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,gid108c0a,gid10d85e,gid104a1f,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Rob B <arby@insightbb.com> Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.opinion,rec.arts.movies.production.sound Subject: Re: Robert Morein and the telescope incident he denied. Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:18:29 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 62 Message-ID: <77c3f1b6-5fde-4c2e-98a9-b102fc6e2f90@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com> References: <C5A83AC6.BCC46%nowhere@nowhere.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.137.124.70 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1233343109 18404 127.0.0.1 (30 Jan 2009 19:18:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=74.137.124.70; posting-account=FT1PkwoAAAAPhpnGyovu2KFyi-ziuChz User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/525.27.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.2.1 Safari/525.27.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)