Article View: rec.audio.pro
Article #1645Re: Used 8/16-track tape recorders
From: Soundhaspriority
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:02
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:02
37 lines
3240 bytes
3240 bytes
"D.M. Procida" <real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> wrote... > Following a very disappointing experience with a digital recording > workstation a few years ago (an Akai DPS12) that put me off for a very > long time, I want to go back to tape, which is what I'm used to. > > Are the various 1/2" 16-track machines worth considering, or would I be > better off with an 8-track machine for 1/2" tape? I think you should give digital another chance. Your indictment of one piece of equipment should not indict the technology. I would guess that, at this time, the majority of users accept digital as superior to any analog medium. There is a tape sound, and some people consider it desirable for certain purposes, but I leave it to the group as to whether it can be approximated by choice of microphones because I know very little about microphones. The cost of tape is so very high! I could sell you an 8-track machine, I saved it from my 66 Volkswagon. In addition to the consumables, you would be creating a maintenance position, I'd like to apply for that job if/when it becomes available. Now that tape is no longer mainstream, one has to search for the parts, consumables, and the expertise. Whatever equipment does exist has degraded due to age, a lot like me - like an analogue tape machine I've just sat around doing nothing for years. There is a constant calibration burden, and anything that sounds like work to me is abhorrent to me. 99% of the maintenance workload is gone with digital, and good ridance. Here I speak from personal experience, as I was once the specialist repairman of a particular Ampex multitrack, I've still got it in my basement with all my cinematography gear, lights, lenses, and the high power water pump that I've invented. You remember I used to have a movie directing and producing career? You had a bad experience, but don't let it color your perception of what digital can do. The other members of this group have much more to say, although none have the intelligence that I have. Bob Morein (310) 237-6511
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C57A7857.5432E%nowhere@nowhere.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1isipij.1k7sgom14ywdcxN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,f9c127a3ed7d2130 X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,14a5cc454a142337,start X-Google-Thread: 104a1f,14a5cc454a142337,start X-Google-Thread: 102c26,14a5cc454a142337,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,gid108c0a,gid104a1f,gid102c26,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mail User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:02:31 +1000 Subject: Re: Used 8/16-track tape recorders From: Soundhaspriority <nowhere@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,rec.music.classical Message-ID: <C57A7857.5432E%nowhere@nowhere.com> Thread-Topic: Used 8/16-track tape recorders Thread-Index: Aclm/gK2AVJQ2gh0C0evjdkKNl2oLQ== References: <1isipij.1k7sgom14ywdcxN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Lines: 40 X-Complaints-To: abuse@buzzardnews.com