Article View: rec.audio.pro
Article #1777Re: the superiority of 96 kHz sampling Options no one mentioned aliasing
From: Soundhaspriority
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:38
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:38
27 lines
2404 bytes
2404 bytes
"MiNe 109" <smcelroy2@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote in message news:smcelroy2-4A985A.10444930062008@nntp.aioe.org... > In article <xPKdncMbi97XY_XVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@comcast.com>, > "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote: > > Posted in rec.audio.pro: > >> Right you are. My bad. > > Bravo! > > BTW, I accept the 'not wanting to be crapped on' excuse for not posting > your work, although it does put you at a disadvantage in other ways. > > Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- For some reason, I don't have the beginning of this thread. However, I believe in "due diligence" to avoid degradation of the audio chain. Hence, I record everything at 88.2. In the future, if DVD-A is a target, I will record at 96. I am less interested in how cheaply recording can be done than how well it can be done. It mystifies me why one would be interested in doing it cheap. Bob Morein (310) 237-6511
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C4903853.A8CEB%nowhere@nowhere.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<d8f2fd83-6048-497e-9daa-70425a5248f9@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <XIydnVDkm-n8YfXVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@comcast.com> <cYGdndWgdJDoYPXVnZ2dnUVZ8gOdnZ2d@posted.plusnet> <xPKdncMbi97XY_XVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@comcast.com> <smcelroy2-4A985A.10444930062008@nntp.aioe.org> <cdydnTICZ83TPvTVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@giganews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,6eea710691a42b7f X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,f63980e123ae26d8,start X-Google-Thread: 104a1f,f63980e123ae26d8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,gid108c0a,gid104a1f,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mail User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:38:59 +1000 Subject: Re: the superiority of 96 kHz sampling Options no one mentioned aliasing From: Soundhaspriority <nowhere@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi,rec.arts.movies.production.sound,alt.sex.lesbian Message-ID: <C4903853.A8CEB%nowhere@nowhere.com> Thread-Topic: the superiority of 96 kHz sampling Options no one mentioned aliasing Thread-Index: AcjbXkmziD0lwEdREd2/4QARJDMMbA== References: <d8f2fd83-6048-497e-9daa-70425a5248f9@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <XIydnVDkm-n8YfXVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@comcast.com> <cYGdndWgdJDoYPXVnZ2dnUVZ8gOdnZ2d@posted.plusnet> <xPKdncMbi97XY_XVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@comcast.com> <smcelroy2-4A985A.10444930062008@nntp.aioe.org> <cdydnTICZ83TPvTVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@giganews.com> X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 X-Complaints-To: abuse@buzzardnews.com