Re: Analog vs modern Digital recording

Article View: rec.audio.pro

Article #2046

#2046

From: Ayn Marx
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 07:38

30 lines
2219 bytes

Harvey Gerst wrote:
> "C, TFM" <ctfm@yourisp.net> wrote:
>
> >kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in
> >news:cu65i1$aeh$1@panix2.panix.com:
> >
> >> Ethan Winer <ethanw at ethanwiner dot com> wrote:
> >>>Gary,
> >>>
> >>>> We'll all be using digital methods whether we like it or not.
Better
> >>>practice. <
> >>>
> >>>Great post. Those were all excellent points.
> >>
> >> Coming into rec.audio.pro and asking about digital vs. analogue is
sort
> >> of like going into a bar and asking about Catholicism vs.
Protestantism.
> >> You won't learn very much, and you might very well get hurt in the
> >> process. --scott
>
> >Those guys in rec.audio.pro are a complete bunch of wankers anyway.
> >C.
>
> Yes, we're wankers, but no, we weren't "complete" - until you showed
up.


Why did this drivel show up on Aus.Hi-Fi?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1107761920.536091.118020@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1107683296.720240.225240@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <6JoNd.37840$iC4.10339@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <O6KdnUdySZgmo5vfRVn-jQ@giganews.com> <cu65i1$aeh$1@panix2.panix.com> <Xns95F69B4B7B840Spamthis@210.8.230.25> <c11e01hhjhqi4s91c6eof1p1rgurrf4ur1@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,6865e8c78abdc750
X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,1e4f13aecd5be192
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,gid108c0a,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ayn Marx" <mdhjwh@iprimus.com.au>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,aus.hi-fi
Subject: Re: Analog vs modern Digital recording
Date: 6 Feb 2005 23:38:40 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <1107761920.536091.118020@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1107683296.720240.225240@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <6JoNd.37840$iC4.10339@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
   <O6KdnUdySZgmo5vfRVn-jQ@giganews.com>
   <cu65i1$aeh$1@panix2.panix.com>
   <Xns95F69B4B7B840Spamthis@210.8.230.25>
   <c11e01hhjhqi4s91c6eof1p1rgurrf4ur1@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.50.143.22
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1107761925 11356 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2005 07:38:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 07:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <c11e01hhjhqi4s91c6eof1p1rgurrf4ur1@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.50.143.22;
   posting-account=EB2TfwwAAADdNGVTSwTTdkEd4xqGrZiP

Reply to Parent Message