🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 10, 3:11 pm, Getting Older and Grumpier Gear Minion <westpase-
he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 10, 3:22 pm, Industrial One <industrial_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 9, 9:20 pm, klu...@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>
> > > You, sir, are one of the people who are destroying Usenet and causing
> > > the kind of reaction against it that is becoming a problem.
>
> > > Yes, Usenet does forward your message from node to node until it gets
> > > to many different destinations, but the header information allows it
> > > to be tracked.  Usenet was designed without security in mind, but it
> > > wasn't designed by idiots.  Without having path information, it's
> > > impossible to debug propagation problems.
>
> > > A system like this would allow scumbag thieves to steal intellectual
> > > property.  Usenet is most certainly not designed for that, although
> > > for that matter it wasn't designed to prevent it either.  If we had to
> > > build something like this in the modern era, I think we'd put a lot more
> > > traceability into it than we did when we built Usenet.
> > > --scott
> > > --
> > > "C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
>
> > Oh blow it out your ass. Usenet was designed and maintained by
> > hackers, and later became a warez trade market for crackers during
> > that era. I'm destroying Usenet? Nigga pleez!
>
> > As for "intellectual property," music nowadays is almost as worthless
> > as the shitstains I wipe off my boot. The music industry is a large
> > cock-whore administration who go on all these crusades to fuck over
> > their own customers because they lose roughly 5% of their profits.
> > They got no problem polluting the radio with a track roughly the same
> > as the last 500 prequels for the last 10 years and they still expect
> > to sue you once you get addicted to their untalented, tasteless,
> > unmelodical bullshit.
>
> > Furthermore, most of the loot I pirate I have already seen in theatres
> > a long time ago, and still own the tapes/DVDs that are at a location I
> > have no access to. Some of the shit is not even sold anymore, or
> > extremely hard to find, so why the hell would I waste my time trying
> > to be legit? 'Cuz the whoreporations want me to forget about it and
> > focus on their latest, top-priced flicks?
>
> > As far as traceability goes. Sharman networks pulled that stunt with
> > Kazaa by tracking down what you search for/download, and we invented
> > Kazaa Lite that waved "fuck you" in a subtle way.
>
> > One of the hackers commandments are voluntary identity, anonymity,
> > security and overall privacy. "Information must be free and accessible
> > to anyone." And USENET was founded by hackers. If you disagree, then
> > you're the one who should piss off.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Please take your comments to another newsgroup,
> and stop crossposting. This is a professional
> audio newsgroup. Not a how to steal with technology
> newsgroup.
> Your attitude towards intellectual
> property, your getto wannabe posing, and your
> ethnic cleansing remarks don't belong
> in any discussion thread.

And what are you gonna do about it, cuntmuffin? Report me to a
moderator? lol.

> Please read the user agreement for Google Groups,
> you've already manage to breach it.

I give a shit? Google Groups can go suck a fat one, and whoever the
faggot is that went so far to build this jewb piece of shit interface
that allows spambots to freely flood all newsgroups with the latest
news on how mother Russia are slaughtering the walking testicles
(Georgia.) I'm switching to Thunderbird.

> Usenet managed to get by fine before you stumbled
> into it. This is not the anonymous data funnel you're
> hoping for. Please learn some net manners.
> No need to reply, please.

You're right, it's almost 30 years old, I didn't expect something
nearly twice as older than I am to be up to par with the leet systems
we of today.