🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<deffe5b7-c620-4975-9b6a-59cb80e40cee@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
 Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 10, 3:11 pm, Getting Older and Grumpier Gear Minion <westpase-
> he...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 10, 3:22 pm, Industrial One <industrial_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 9, 9:20 pm, klu...@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
> >
> > > > You, sir, are one of the people who are destroying Usenet and causing
> > > > the kind of reaction against it that is becoming a problem.
> >
> > > > Yes, Usenet does forward your message from node to node until it gets
> > > > to many different destinations, but the header information allows it
> > > > to be tracked.  Usenet was designed without security in mind, but it
> > > > wasn't designed by idiots.  Without having path information, it's
> > > > impossible to debug propagation problems.
> >
> > > > A system like this would allow scumbag thieves to steal intellectual
> > > > property.  Usenet is most certainly not designed for that, although
> > > > for that matter it wasn't designed to prevent it either.  If we had to
> > > > build something like this in the modern era, I think we'd put a lot more
> > > > traceability into it than we did when we built Usenet.
> > > > --scott
> > > > --
> > > > "C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
> >
> > > Oh blow it out your ass. Usenet was designed and maintained by
> > > hackers, and later became a warez trade market for crackers during
> > > that era. I'm destroying Usenet? Nigga pleez!
> >
> > > As for "intellectual property," music nowadays is almost as worthless
> > > as the shitstains I wipe off my boot. The music industry is a large
> > > cock-whore administration who go on all these crusades to fuck over
> > > their own customers because they lose roughly 5% of their profits.
> > > They got no problem polluting the radio with a track roughly the same
> > > as the last 500 prequels for the last 10 years and they still expect
> > > to sue you once you get addicted to their untalented, tasteless,
> > > unmelodical bullshit.
> >
> > > Furthermore, most of the loot I pirate I have already seen in theatres
> > > a long time ago, and still own the tapes/DVDs that are at a location I
> > > have no access to. Some of the shit is not even sold anymore, or
> > > extremely hard to find, so why the hell would I waste my time trying
> > > to be legit? 'Cuz the whoreporations want me to forget about it and
> > > focus on their latest, top-priced flicks?
> >
> > > As far as traceability goes. Sharman networks pulled that stunt with
> > > Kazaa by tracking down what you search for/download, and we invented
> > > Kazaa Lite that waved "fuck you" in a subtle way.
> >
> > > One of the hackers commandments are voluntary identity, anonymity,
> > > security and overall privacy. "Information must be free and accessible
> > > to anyone." And USENET was founded by hackers. If you disagree, then
> > > you're the one who should piss off.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > Please take your comments to another newsgroup,
> > and stop crossposting. This is a professional
> > audio newsgroup. Not a how to steal with technology
> > newsgroup.
> > Your attitude towards intellectual
> > property, your getto wannabe posing, and your
> > ethnic cleansing remarks don't belong
> > in any discussion thread.
> 
> And what are you gonna do about it, cuntmuffin? Report me to a
> moderator? lol.
> 
> > Please read the user agreement for Google Groups,
> > you've already manage to breach it.
> 
> I give a shit? Google Groups can go suck a fat one, and whoever the
> faggot is that went so far to build this jewb piece of shit interface
> that allows spambots to freely flood all newsgroups with the latest
> news on how mother Russia are slaughtering the walking testicles
> (Georgia.) I'm switching to Thunderbird.
> 
> > Usenet managed to get by fine before you stumbled
> > into it. This is not the anonymous data funnel you're
> > hoping for. Please learn some net manners.
> > No need to reply, please.
> 
> You're right, it's almost 30 years old, I didn't expect something
> nearly twice as older than I am to be up to par with the leet systems
> we of today.

Wow, an adolescent bigot who doesn't write well.  Who would have thought?