Re: HELP! TASCAM DA-30 MkII

Article View: rec.audio.pro

Article #2140

#2140

From: Mike Cohn
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 00:00

8 lines
1105 bytes

What's interesting about it, is that the Tascam rep. told me that they 
have the best failure rate of any DAT (.05%).  That still seems like a 
lot to me.  The old DA-30s were a lot more reliable.  They have a 
different transport manufacturer now, though.  I think I'll try to score 
a Panasonic instead.
-- 
When surfin' the 'net, please visit  http://www.io.com/guerilla
And, remember-mixing is 10% knowledge and ability and 90% babysitting!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <312AE5FC.7CDA@io.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3128A329.1E44@io.com> <bizy-2002962205560001@bizy.dialup.access.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,23ba4b28bcbf8ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,public
X-Google-Thread: 1064d2,23ba4b28bcbf8ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid1064d2,public
From: Mike Cohn <imix4u@io.com>
Subject: Re: HELP!  TASCAM DA-30 MkII
Date: 1996/02/21
Message-ID: <312AE5FC.7CDA@io.com>
X-Deja-AN: 140357429
references: <3128A329.1E44@io.com> <bizy-2002962205560001@bizy.dialup.access.net>
to: Derek Sivers / HIT ME <bizy@panix.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: GUERILLA AUDIO
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,austin.music
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I)

Reply to Parent Message