🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio.pro
Article #2317

Re: Quadrasynth plus rack unit vs. ???

#2317
From: Deity2
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00
7 lines
1366 bytes
dont even touch the s4 unless you can live without resonant filters.  i
would suggest a JV 880 or 1080 by roland .  the 1080 cost alot more than
the S4, but i has alot better sounds than just about anything on the
planet.  The 880 is good to, but is significantly cheaper.


deity2
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4i34ih$811@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <313E3687.3A5E@intuit.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1000af,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gid1000af,public
X-Google-Thread: 108ff0,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gid108ff0,public
X-Google-Thread: 105710,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gid105710,public
X-Google-Thread: f4c6d,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c6d,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cf58,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf58,public
X-Google-Thread: 115513,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gid115513,public
X-Google-Thread: fd490,2319dd05327b7b33
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd490,public
From: deity2@aol.com (Deity2)
Subject: Re: Quadrasynth plus rack unit vs. ???
Date: 1996/03/12
Message-ID: <4i34ih$811@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
X-Deja-AN: 142380203
sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
references: <313E3687.3A5E@intuit.com>
organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
reply-to: deity2@aol.com (Deity2)
newsgroups: rec.audio.pro,comp.music.midi,comp.music.misc,rec.music.makers.marketplace,alt.music.midi,alt.music.makers.electronic,ba.music