🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi Dec,

>>>> Your point (4) would seem to point to the fact that UK record

Are you referring to my post?  If so, I didn't mention any studios.  In fact 
the only trax I've purchased have been done here in the US, so I couldn't 
say one way or the other about UK studios anyhow.  Perhaps you were 
referring to the OP's post and not my #4...?
-- 
Sue Morton

"Dec [Cluskey]" <dec@makehits.com> wrote in message 
news:0a1c0f80-619b-462c-96aa-31f967746071@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 5, 6:37 pm, "Sue Morton" <867-5...@domain.invalid> wrote:
>> 4.  I have purcahsed "minus one" recordings that are without a doubt the
>> original artist's popular recording, and the lead vocals are entirely
>> absent.  In those instances they are often marketed as "original artist
>> studio mixes".  These seem to be the exact same airplay mix that became
>> popular, but without the lead vocal, and are generally the newer songs.
>> When the "minus one" church trax industry recently took off like wildfire
>> the studios responded with a very marketable by-product.
>> --
>> Sue Morton
>>
>> "Dec [Cluskey]" <d...@makehits.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:2aaed80f-3ba8-4a42-a26b-4a1ba25e77f3@a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > I have noticed in the past year or so that back tracks bought from
>> > High Quality companies in the UK are hard to distinguish from the
>> > original chart hits.  In fact, some would seem to still have a
>> > smidgeon of the star's lead vocal on.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Your point (4) would seem to point to the fact that UK record
> companies seem to make 'back track' versions available?
>
> There was a small period in the 80's where the second track on a CD
> would be the back track with the lead vocal missing.  This practice
> has been dropped, but perhaps, the record companies make this service
> available to interested parties?  As they may do to dub artists when
> they require just the original lead vocals with no backing?
>
> Dec [Cluskey]