Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1020Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?
From: Paul Dormer
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
13 lines
1716 bytes
1716 bytes
Tim O'Connor <rnuto@minyos.its.rmit.edu.au> wrote: >I HAVE spend long hours doing both Blind and sighted A/B comparisons with >my Sony MZ-R50 portable recorder. Im HUGLY impressed with it. I couldnt >be happier with the recording quality, which to me IS identical sonically >to CD. I tested it... S/N ratio ~80db, flat with 1dB, negligable distortion.. a Nakamichi beater (in your pocket) ;-) Paul Dormer Media@clara.net ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Sound Design, Editing, Mastering
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<369b8bc9.5334988@news.clara.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> <KEsm2.1521$Ge3.8055877@news.itd.umich.edu> <369A8E31.D11C02CE@mcmail.com> <77ekjs$f70$1@aggedor.rmit.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public From: media@clara.net (Paul Dormer) Subject: Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ? Date: 1999/01/12 Message-ID: <369b8bc9.5334988@news.clara.net> X-Deja-AN: 431761233 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> <KEsm2.1521$Ge3.8055877@news.itd.umich.edu> <369A8E31.D11C02CE@mcmail.com> <77ekjs$f70$1@aggedor.rmit.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@clara.net X-Trace: nnrp2.clara.net 916167178 195.8.78.193 (Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:52:58 BST) Organization: CDM MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: media@clara.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:52:58 BST Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio