Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1023Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?
From: John Busenitz
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
19 lines
1804 bytes
1804 bytes
Pascal wrote in message <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net>... >I know I am going to get BLASTED for that but... imagine this : > >You copy 256kbps .mp3's on a CD-R and play them back through your >hyper-noise PC house and through the S/PDIF output of your Sound Blaster >card... to your external DAC... and you get equal or better results than >your CD Transport with alumnium CDs to your DAC... Well, this is impossible. Not because audiophile transports make a difference, but because an MP3 is itself WORSE than a CD, by definition. It is lossy, it CANNOT be better. Maybe sound the same with certain types of signals, but NOT better. -- John busenitz@earthlink.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77guj5$l6$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public From: "John Busenitz" <busenitz@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ? Date: 1999/01/12 Message-ID: <77guj5$l6$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 431968416 References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 X-ELN-Date: 13 Jan 1999 01:57:57 GMT X-ELN-Insert-Date: Tue Jan 12 18:05:03 1999 Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile