Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1027Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?
From: Arny Kr�ger
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 00:00
15 lines
1768 bytes
1768 bytes
John Busenitz wrote in message <77guj5$l6$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... > >Well, this is impossible. Not because audiophile transports make a >difference, but because an MP3 is itself WORSE than a CD, by definition. >It is lossy, it CANNOT be better. Maybe sound the same with certain >types of signals, but NOT better. > I agree. However, we are continually presented with people who prefer audio components with audible flaws, like SET's and vinyl. So, maybe some people like the sound of the artifacts of MP3. Seems possible!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ff%m2.6$Md6.197@news.flash.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> <77guj5$l6$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public From: "Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net> Subject: Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ? Date: 1999/01/13 Message-ID: <ff%m2.6$Md6.197@news.flash.net> X-Deja-AN: 432091979 References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <369A4971.D050DBD3@usa.net> <77guj5$l6$1@fir.prod.itd.earthlink.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 916226123 208.194.219.193 (Wed, 13 Jan 1999 05:15:23 CDT) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 05:15:23 CDT Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile